2017
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic mapping of biomass yield in three interconnected Miscanthus populations

Abstract: Improving biomass yield is a major goal of Miscanthus breeding. We conducted a study on one interspecific Miscanthus sinensis 9 Miscanthus sacchariflorus F 1 population and two intraspecific M. sinensis F 1 populations, each of which shared a common parent. A field trial was established at Urbana, IL during spring 2011, and phenotypic data were collected in 2012 and 2013 for fourteen yield traits. Six high-density parental genetic maps, as well as a consensus genetic map integrating M. sinensis and M. sacchari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
7
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, joint‐population analyses produced significantly higher resolution for QTLs (i.e. smaller confidence intervals) than single‐population analyses, and this was consistent with our previous findings from genetic mapping for biomass yield traits (Dong, Liu, et al, ). Average confidence interval across the 31 in‐common QTLs was 27.4 ± 1.9 cM for single‐population analyses but was only 17.6 ± 1.4 cM for joint‐population analyses (Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, joint‐population analyses produced significantly higher resolution for QTLs (i.e. smaller confidence intervals) than single‐population analyses, and this was consistent with our previous findings from genetic mapping for biomass yield traits (Dong, Liu, et al, ). Average confidence interval across the 31 in‐common QTLs was 27.4 ± 1.9 cM for single‐population analyses but was only 17.6 ± 1.4 cM for joint‐population analyses (Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…With joint‐population analysis, 53 QTL were detected (Figure ), whereas only 39 were detected with single‐population analyses; moreover, most of the QTL detected in single‐population analyses were also detected in the joint‐population analysis (31 in‐common QTL). Previous studies of two to ten interconnected populations have also found that joint‐population analyses identified most of the QTL identified by single‐population analyses, although each method also identified some QTLs uniquely (Chandler et al, ; Dong, Liu, et al, ; Li et al, ; Yang et al, ). Joint linkage analysis is expected to increase the power to detect QTL, and to estimate locus positions and allelic effects with greater precision than single‐population analyses (Blanc, Charcosset, Mangnin, Gallalis, & Moreau, ; Dong, Liu, et al, ; Li et al, ; Negeri, Coles, Holland, & Balint‐Kurti, ; Walling et al, ; Yang et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results can show the photosynthesis efficiency and chilling treatment at maturity stage. Another mapping population was generated by Dong et al (2016) …”
Section: Bioenergy Crops and Biomass Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%