2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.104868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic link between the Late Mesozoic granitic magmatism and W mineralization in NE China: Constraints from in-situ U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry of wolframite, and whole-rocks geochemistry analyses of W-bearing granites from the Sansheng W-Mo deposit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 157 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is still challenging to resolve the source of ore‐forming fluids and understand the contribution of additional fluid sources (e.g., metamorphic fluids and meteoric water) only with the means of geochronology. Besides, although it has been accepted that hydrothermal W‐rich fluids derived from highly fractionated granites provide the primary source material of W for wolframite precipitation (e.g., Li et al, 2022; Pan et al, 2019; Xie, Zeng, Lan, et al, 2022), the sources of Fe and Mn for precipitating wolframite and sources of Cu, Pb, and Zn for precipitation sulphides remain contentious.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is still challenging to resolve the source of ore‐forming fluids and understand the contribution of additional fluid sources (e.g., metamorphic fluids and meteoric water) only with the means of geochronology. Besides, although it has been accepted that hydrothermal W‐rich fluids derived from highly fractionated granites provide the primary source material of W for wolframite precipitation (e.g., Li et al, 2022; Pan et al, 2019; Xie, Zeng, Lan, et al, 2022), the sources of Fe and Mn for precipitating wolframite and sources of Cu, Pb, and Zn for precipitation sulphides remain contentious.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%