2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic interactions matter more in less-optimal environments: a Focused Review of “Phenotype uniformity in combined-stress environments has a different genetic architecture than in single-stress treatments” (Makumburage and Stapleton, 2011)

Abstract: An increase in the distribution of data points indicates the presence of genetic or environmental modifiers. Mapping of the genetic control of the spread of points, the uniformity, allows us to allocate genetic difference in point distribution to adjacent, cis effects or to independently segregating, trans genetic effects. Our genetic architecture-mapping experiment elucidated the “environmental context specificity” of modifiers, the number and effect size of positive and negative alleles important for uniform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GWAS identified MTAs for safflower traits GWAS has been widely used to study the genetic basis of the important agronomy traits with diverse germplasm in crops (Liu and Yan 2019). Multienvironment trials normally were combined to present the overall phenotypic variation for GWAS to detecting the associations between markers and traits (Landers and Stapleton 2014;Leamy et al 2017c). However, with diverse germplasm, the phenotypic variation displayed under differed environments can be used to measure the plasticity of the traits or trait G × E level with proper statistical models (Des Marais et al 2013;Malosetti et al 2013).…”
Section: Different G × E Interaction Patterns Were Observed For Saffl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GWAS identified MTAs for safflower traits GWAS has been widely used to study the genetic basis of the important agronomy traits with diverse germplasm in crops (Liu and Yan 2019). Multienvironment trials normally were combined to present the overall phenotypic variation for GWAS to detecting the associations between markers and traits (Landers and Stapleton 2014;Leamy et al 2017c). However, with diverse germplasm, the phenotypic variation displayed under differed environments can be used to measure the plasticity of the traits or trait G × E level with proper statistical models (Des Marais et al 2013;Malosetti et al 2013).…”
Section: Different G × E Interaction Patterns Were Observed For Saffl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, some of these variation-increasing loci operate only in some environments. For example, some welldefined Quantitative Trait Loci in particular maize strains increase variation in all tested environments including normal cultivation, while others increase variation only in plants grown with reduced water or reduced nitrogen (58,59). Because in maize uniformity of plant height is considered a desirable trait and is under human selection, in this case, we might say that loci that decrease phenotypic uniformity decrease fitness.…”
Section: Genes That Increase Phenotypic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GWAS identi ed MTAs for sa ower traits GWAS has been widely used to study the genetic basis of the important agronomy traits with diverse germplasm in crops [48]. Multi-environment trials normally were combined to present the overall phenotypic variation for GWAS to detecting the associations between markers and traits [49,50]. However, with diverse germplasm, the phenotypic variation displayed under differed environments can be used to measure the plasticity of the traits or trait G × E level with proper statistical models [51,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%