2009
DOI: 10.1126/science.1166426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Interactions Between Transcription Factors Cause Natural Variation in Yeast

Abstract: Our understanding of the genetic basis of phenotypic diversity is limited by the paucity of examples in which multiple, interacting loci have been identified. We show that natural variation in the efficiency of sporulation, the program in yeast that initiates the sexual phase of the life cycle, between oak tree and vineyard strains is due to allelic variation between four nucleotide changes in three transcription factors: IME1, RME1, and RSF1. Furthermore, we identified that selection has shaped quantitative v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
238
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(38 reference statements)
13
238
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, pathways enriched for nonsynonymous polymorphism across S. cerevisiae may shed light on the changes in the life history of this species since its divergence from S. bayanus. In addition, some cases of pathway-level polymorphism may result from divergence between S. cerevisiae populations, as the result of adaptation (36,37) or of relaxed selection in particular niches. Improved sequence sampling of the well-defined populations in this species (30) ultimately will enable in-depth study of the changes in selective pressure at play during their divergence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, pathways enriched for nonsynonymous polymorphism across S. cerevisiae may shed light on the changes in the life history of this species since its divergence from S. bayanus. In addition, some cases of pathway-level polymorphism may result from divergence between S. cerevisiae populations, as the result of adaptation (36,37) or of relaxed selection in particular niches. Improved sequence sampling of the well-defined populations in this species (30) ultimately will enable in-depth study of the changes in selective pressure at play during their divergence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Lemos et al (2008) and Graze et al (2009) found a significant association between dominance for gene expression and variants in trans-acting elements in Drosophila. Moreover, trans effects could be responsible for many phenotypic differences, as reported in yeast (Gerke et al, 2009). Among the hybrids of the Rupert, Laval and domestic brook charr, we previously found important differences in the mode of gene expression inheritance relative to the parental populations.…”
Section: Cis-acting Regulatory Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single‐SNP analyses may miss such a complexity, primarily because if a genetic factor operates through a mechanism involving multiple genes, and is also affected by environmental factors, the single investigation may not examine statistical interactions between loci that are informative about the biological and biochemical pathways underpinning the phenotype. On the contrary, SNP interactions may carry more information about the phenotype than those observed from individual SNPs alone (Gerke, Lorenz & Cohen, 2009; Su et al., 2015). Assessing SNP‐SNP interactions at the gene level co‐occurring within a specific phenotype and not due to linkage disequilibrium (LD) can overcome this problem, possibly finding specific subprocesses more strongly associated with the phenotype than single‐SNP analysis (Cordell, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%