2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic integrity of somaclonal variants in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O Kuntze) as revealed by inter simple sequence repeats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to other approaches, the application of ISSR, RAPD, and RFLP markers, 4.36% of variation in somatic embryo-derived plantlets of coffee was revealed (Rani et al 2000). ISSR markers appeared to be highly efficient in the detection of variation (50%) among somaclones derived from single cell line originating from a cotyledonary culture of tea (Thomas et al 2006). Whereas, the simple sequence repeats successfully detected about 31% of chimeric mutations that were assigned to either DNA polymerase slippage effect or chromosome loss in cacao SE regenerants (Rodriguez Lopez et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In comparison to other approaches, the application of ISSR, RAPD, and RFLP markers, 4.36% of variation in somatic embryo-derived plantlets of coffee was revealed (Rani et al 2000). ISSR markers appeared to be highly efficient in the detection of variation (50%) among somaclones derived from single cell line originating from a cotyledonary culture of tea (Thomas et al 2006). Whereas, the simple sequence repeats successfully detected about 31% of chimeric mutations that were assigned to either DNA polymerase slippage effect or chromosome loss in cacao SE regenerants (Rodriguez Lopez et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…ISSR is a useful marker system which has been successfully employed to measure genetic stability/instability in tea (Thomas et al, 2006), Prunus mume (Ning et al, 2007), Swertia chirayita Dhawan, 2007), A. albus (Hu et al, 2008), London plane tree (Huang et al, 2008) and gerbera (Bhatia et al, 2009). It has several obvious advantages over random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), such as higher reproducibility and informativeness (Nagaoka and Ogihara, 1997), which make ISSR more attractive for genotyping and diversity studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at the species level; mean PPB was 21.4-50%, and mean I was 0.229 at the population level (Kaundun et al, 2000;Kumar, 2002;Chen et al, 2005;Thomas et al, 2006). In the present study, PPB was 88.89%, H was 0.2809, and I was 0.4278 at the species level; mean PPB was 42.12%, mean H was 0.1373, and I was 0.2058 at population level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%