Genetic Influences on Brain Gene Expression in Rats Selected for Tameness and Aggression

Abstract

Interindividual differences in many behaviors are partly due to genetic differences, but the identification of the genes and variants that influence behavior remains challenging. Here, we studied an F 2 intercross of two outbred lines of rats selected for tame and aggressive behavior toward humans for .64 generations. By using a mapping approach that is able to identify genetic loci segregating within the lines, we identified four times more loci influencing tameness and aggression than by an approach that assumes fixation of causative alleles, suggesting that many causative loci were not driven to fixation by the selection. We used RNA sequencing in 150 F 2 animals to identify hundreds of loci that influence brain gene expression. Several of these loci colocalize with tameness loci and may reflect the same genetic variants. Through analyses of correlations between allele effects on behavior and gene expression, differential expression between the tame and aggressive rat selection lines, and correlations between gene expression and tameness in F 2 animals, we identify the genes Gltscr2, Lgi4, Zfp40, and Slc17a7 as candidate contributors to the strikingly different behavior of the tame and aggressive animals. B EHAVIORAL differences among members of a species are in part due to genetic variation. The identification of the genes and variants that influence behavior remains challenging. In human genome-wide association studies of psychiatric and cognitive traits, the identified loci typically explain only a small fraction of the heritability, i.e., the additive genetic contribution to the trait (Watanabe et al. 2007;Hovatta and Barlow 2008;Deary et al. 2009;Otowa et al. 2009;Calboli et al. 2010;Terracciano et al. 2010;Flint and Munafo 2013;Rietveld et al. 2013;Sokolowska and Hovatta 2013). In experimental crosses in model species, especially between inbred lines, the identified loci (termed quantitative trait loci, QTL), often explain much more of the heritability (Lynch and Walsh 1998). However, in this design the spatial resolution is limited-the QTL are wide and contain many, sometimes hundreds of genes. With the exception of a handful of identified genes with quantitative effects on behavioral traits (Yalcin et al. 2004;Watanabe et al. 2007;McGrath et al. 2009;Bendesky et al. 2012;Goodson et al. 2012), gene identification is particularly difficult for behavioral QTL that often have modest effect sizes (Flint 2003;Willis-Owen and Flint 2006;Wright et al. 2006;Hovatta and Barlow 2008).The causal variants within a QTL can alter the protein sequence encoded by a gene or affect gene expression. Such Musunuru et al. 2010). A few eQTL studies have also recently been carried out to identify candidate genes for behavioral QTL (Hitzemann et al. 2004;De Jong et al. 2011;Saba et al. 2011;Kelly et al. 2012).Here, we studied two lines of rats (Rattus norvegicus) that, starting from one wild population, have been selected for increased tameness and increased aggression toward humans, respectively. These experimental...

Genomic responses to selection for tame/aggressive behaviors in the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes)

“…They are eager to establish human contact by 37 one month after birth, and remain friendly throughout their entire lives (11). 38 In parallel with selection for tameness, selective breeding for aggressive response 39 to humans was started in 1970, with the aim to develop a population demonstrating less 40 variation in behavior than conventional foxes (10,11). This trait also showed a selection 41 response ( Figure 1A).…”

Genetical Genomics of Behavior: A Novel Chicken Genomic Model for Anxiety Behavior

“…Successful examples of behavioral QTG identification are almost exclusively limited to mouse and rat models (Yalcin et al 2004;Chiavegatto et al 2008;Kim et al 2009;Tomida et al 2009;Gyetvai et al 2011;Wang et al 2012;Heyne et al 2014), Drosophila (Anholt and Mackay 2004;Mackay 2004;Fitzpatrick et al 2005), and the honeybee (Robinson et al , 2008. The ramifications for the identification of such behavioral genes are many and varied.…”

Chicken domestication : Effects of tameness on brain gene expression and DNA methylation

“…Genes affecting diverging traits in the selection lines might therefore be missing from the Paper III and IV datasets, as sample sizes and power were too small to find small effects. This occurs also in larger datasets, demonstrating the complexity of the genetic architecture of behavior [173]. The rapid phenotypic response in the selected RJF used in the studies of this thesis are probably due to existing variation, and such selection will not reduce variation as much as selection for a new mutation would.…”