2008
DOI: 10.2478/s10086-008-0030-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Inactivation of Dace, Leuciscus Leuciscus (L.), Gametes Using UV Irradiation

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The results of genetic inactivation of dace, Leuciscus leuciscus (L.), gametes using UV irradiation are presented. Dace sperm was genetically inactivated with UV irradiation doses ranging from 384 to 3840 J m . The UV treatment did not kill the spermatozoa, and following irradiation the activated spermatozoa exhibited a high percentage of motility. The percentage of hatched larvae in all the experimental groups, in which genetically inactivated dace eggs were fertilized with spermatozoa from the yell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar data to the present work have been reported by other authors: i.e. Scheerer et al (1986) and Babiak et al (2002aBabiak et al ( , 2002b for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum 1792), May et al (1988) for brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill 1814), Arai et al (1992) for loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus Cantor 1842), Bongers et al (1994) for common carp, Kucharczyk (2002) for common bream, Lin and Dabrowski (1998) for northern pike and Kucharczyk (2001) and Kucharczyk et al (2008bKucharczyk et al ( , 2008c for ide (Leuciscus idus L.) and dace (Leuciscus leuciscus L.). Such low survival rates of androgenotes were probably connected with the synergic effect of a few sublethal manipulations such as irradiation of oocytes and applied temperature shock as well as increased inbreeding.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Similar data to the present work have been reported by other authors: i.e. Scheerer et al (1986) and Babiak et al (2002aBabiak et al ( , 2002b for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum 1792), May et al (1988) for brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill 1814), Arai et al (1992) for loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus Cantor 1842), Bongers et al (1994) for common carp, Kucharczyk (2002) for common bream, Lin and Dabrowski (1998) for northern pike and Kucharczyk (2001) and Kucharczyk et al (2008bKucharczyk et al ( , 2008c for ide (Leuciscus idus L.) and dace (Leuciscus leuciscus L.). Such low survival rates of androgenotes were probably connected with the synergic effect of a few sublethal manipulations such as irradiation of oocytes and applied temperature shock as well as increased inbreeding.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The applied dose of UV irradiation was 3456 J m -2 , at which almost 100% haploid embryos were produced at a hatching rate of over 2%. These doses were higher than those described as the optimum UV oocyte treatment for common carp (2500 J m -2 ) by Bongers et al (1994) or for northern pike (660 to 1320 Jm -2 ) by Lin and Dabrowski (1998) and were similar to those reported by Kucharczyk (2002) for common bream and Kucharczyk (2001) for ide (2700 to 3500 J m -2 ). For doubling chromosomal material during the androgenesis process, heat shocks were usually applied and, in some cases, very intensively (up to 42°C) (Arai et al, 1995;Grunina et al, 1995;Bercsenyi et al, 1998;Pandian and Koteeswaran, 1998;Kucharczyk, 2002).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations