2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic implications of silvicultural regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
88
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Forest management practices have also been shown to increase genetic structure compared with natural forests, especially if the breeding practices imply drastic reduction of the effective population size (Young and Merriam, 1994;Finkeldey and Ziehe, 2004). Population size reduction could potentially increase the rate of selffertilization because of the reduction in number of local compatible mates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest management practices have also been shown to increase genetic structure compared with natural forests, especially if the breeding practices imply drastic reduction of the effective population size (Young and Merriam, 1994;Finkeldey and Ziehe, 2004). Population size reduction could potentially increase the rate of selffertilization because of the reduction in number of local compatible mates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finkeldey and Ziehe (2004), in a review of the genetic implications of silvicultural regimes, noticed that genetic structure differences in managed versus unmanaged forests are difficult to monitor because of life-cycle characteristics of most forest tree species. This usually determines a time lag before the consequences of disturbances, such as habitat fragmentation or exploitation, can be detected (Kramer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor explaining the deviation from HWE may be the very few effective outcross males contributing to pollination in the Norway spruce (Burczyk et al, 2004). Fertility components that are known to vary strongly from year to year for trees (Finkeldey and Ziehe, 2004) may possibly explain such an uneven contribution from outcrossing trees.…”
Section: Mating Within Standsmentioning
confidence: 99%