2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic impacts of a commercial aquaculture lease on adjacent oyster populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…123 , such that the effects of introgression from farm-reared animals is rapidly diluted. Such introgression may even be beneficial in some species, for example, bivalve shellfish, by contributing to natural recruitment and adding genetic variation to wild populations 124,125 . By contrast, freshwater and anadromous species are characterized by fairly small effective population sizes 126 , and gene flow can be heavily modified (or blocked) 127,128 .…”
Section: [H2] Interaction Between Farmed and Wild Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…123 , such that the effects of introgression from farm-reared animals is rapidly diluted. Such introgression may even be beneficial in some species, for example, bivalve shellfish, by contributing to natural recruitment and adding genetic variation to wild populations 124,125 . By contrast, freshwater and anadromous species are characterized by fairly small effective population sizes 126 , and gene flow can be heavily modified (or blocked) 127,128 .…”
Section: [H2] Interaction Between Farmed and Wild Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular for wild freshwater and anadromous fish such as salmon with relatively small effective population sizes, gene pools found in nature can be significantly affected by inflow of genes from farmed animals (Hindar et al 2006;Glover et al 2017). Conversely, it has been suggested that interbreeding with captive native oyster stock may benefit sparse wild populations by contributing to genetic variation (Varney et al 2018;Hornick & Plough 2019). Besides preventing introgression effects of escapees from farms, sterility can also avoid early maturation during on-growing, which may negatively affect growth, welfare and product quality leading to harvest downgrades.…”
Section: Sterility and Gender Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, it has been suggested that interbreeding with captive native oyster stock may benefit sparse wild populations by contributing to genetic variation (Varney et al . 2018; Hornick & Plough 2019). Besides preventing introgression effects of escapees from farms, sterility can also avoid early maturation during on‐growing, which may negatively affect growth, welfare and product quality leading to harvest downgrades.…”
Section: Sterility and Gender Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unprecedented rates of species introductions and pest invasions in the marine environment, alongside accidental and deliberate releases from hatchery environments, have been another major contributor to genetic diversity loss in native biota due to competition, predation, infection, or introgression effects (Glover et al, 2017; Laikre et al, 2010; Olden et al, 2004; Teagle & Smale, 2018). The translocation of non‐native species and populations in the shellfish aquaculture industry for instance has resulted in widespread hybridization, impacting the genetic diversity of natural wild populations, as well as impacting the physiology of farmed populations (Gardner et al, 2016; Michalek et al, 2016; Ć egvić‐Bubić et al, 2020; Varney et al, 2018). Aquaculture escapees, as well as hatchery‐bred populations released for marine stock enhancement projects, have likewise had widespread effects on the genetics of wild populations, including changes in allele frequencies and population structure, hybridization and introgression, and loss of genetic diversity (Glover et al, 2017; Kitada, 2018).…”
Section: Impacts On Genetic Diversity In the Marine Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%