2017
DOI: 10.18805/ijar.b-3330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic impact on external and internal egg quality traits of Vanaraja and Gramapriya birds and their crosses in Bihar

Abstract: Poultry farming is gaining strength in mitigating livelihood and nutritional security to the poor farmers which constitute 60% of the India’s population. Thus eggs of superior quality is prerequisite for profitable marketing and for hatchability too. The present study was conducted on two improved varieties, Vanaraja (dual purpose type) and Gramapriya (the layer type) chicken developed at PDP, Hyderabad and their crosses on random mating. The genetic groups taken were Gramapriya (male) x Gramapriya (female),Va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most internal (YW, AW, and YH) and all external egg quality traits were significantly ( P < 0.001) different among the genotypes. Similarly, other authors (Al-Rawi and Amer 1972 ; Sola-Ojo and Ayorinde 2011 ; Khalil et al 2013 ; Sinha et al 2018 ; Hussen et al 2019 ; Udoh et al 2020 ; Wolde et al 2021 ) found significant differences among different genotypes for most egg quality traits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most internal (YW, AW, and YH) and all external egg quality traits were significantly ( P < 0.001) different among the genotypes. Similarly, other authors (Al-Rawi and Amer 1972 ; Sola-Ojo and Ayorinde 2011 ; Khalil et al 2013 ; Sinha et al 2018 ; Hussen et al 2019 ; Udoh et al 2020 ; Wolde et al 2021 ) found significant differences among different genotypes for most egg quality traits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…These results generally suggest that crossbreeding could be used to enhance those traits. On the contrary, Sinha et al ( 2018 ) observed significantly higher EW, EL, EWD, ST, SW, AH, AW, and HU in the two purebreds compared with the crossbreds; thus, the traits did not improve as a result of crossbreeding. The differences among the findings in exploiting heterosis would be related to the variations in gene frequency among the parental breeds involved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Also, significant differences in shell thickness might attribute to variations of resistance to breakage, contamination, bio-economic characteristics, and hatchability across breeds [19] [23] [58]. Furthermore, the variation in eggshell thickness might be greatly affected by selection and epigenetics across and within genotypes [22].…”
Section: External and Internal Egg Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egg quality is composed of those characteristics of an egg that affect its acceptability by consumers [21]. External egg quality is presented by its weight, shape, percentage of eggshell, and thickness which vary according to the species, breed, variety, feed, management, and environment as reported by the different researchers in different breeds [22]. Similarly, internal egg quality is presented by albumen quality and yolk quality which are responsible for the nutritional value of eggs of breeds and de-termine their acceptability to the consumers [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to these exterior qualities, internal egg quality is represented by albumen quality and yolk quality, which are in charge of the nutritional content of breed-speci c eggs and decide whether or not consumers would accept them. (Zita et al, 2009;Sinha et al, 2017;Atsbaha et al, 2022). The qualities of an egg are what determine whether a consumer will accept it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%