2022
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic heterogeneity: Challenges, impacts, and methods through an associative lens

Abstract: Genetic heterogeneity describes the occurrence of the same or similar phenotypes through different genetic mechanisms in different individuals.Robustly characterizing and accounting for genetic heterogeneity is crucial to pursuing the goals of precision medicine, for discovering novel disease biomarkers, and for identifying targets for treatments. Failure to account for

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
(210 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard GWAS approach is a single-locus one—each variant is tested for association with the trait, and it is implicitly assumed that the presence of other causative loci does not affect marginal associations 1 . This is well-suited for identifying common variants with relatively large effect but is not designed for more complex situations 2,3 . Attempting to map multiple causal variants using single-locus models will generally decrease power and can bias estimates.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard GWAS approach is a single-locus one—each variant is tested for association with the trait, and it is implicitly assumed that the presence of other causative loci does not affect marginal associations 1 . This is well-suited for identifying common variants with relatively large effect but is not designed for more complex situations 2,3 . Attempting to map multiple causal variants using single-locus models will generally decrease power and can bias estimates.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, GARFIELD combines the efficient variable selection (among thousands of markers from a given region or set of regions) and prediction advantages of random forests to produce pseudo-genotypes that help identify complex interactions, and subsequently use logic gates to explore and describe them. We note that several other methods for detecting allelic heterogeneity exist 3,[18][19][20] , particularly various collapsing tests for capturing the cumulative effects of many rare variants 21,22 . Likewise, random forests have been used for variant selection for nearly 20 years 23,24 (although our use of logic gates appears to be novel).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MultiSURF (49) and collective feature selection (50)), and modeling (i.e. ExSTraCS (51), a rule-based algorithm designed specifically to address the challenges of detecting and characterizing epistasis (52) and heterogeneous associations (53) in biomedical data), (4) conduct statistical significance comparisons (between algorithms and datasets), (5) collectively compare and contrast feature importance (FI) estimates across modelling algorithms, and (6) generate a comprehensive sharable summary report. With respect to overall AutoML design and goals, STREAMLINE currently is most closely related to MLIJAR-supervised (33) and MLme (32) AutoML tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of the right subgrouping, phenotypic heterogeneity may compromise statistical analysis by leading to a substantial power loss and potentially low reproducibility rates in detecting and understanding the underlying mechanisms of heterogeneous phenotypes [10,[25][26][27]. Since the sub-classification or heterogeneity nature of the molecular background of phenotypes is typically unknown, it becomes a computational and statistical challenge to find surrogates to the subtypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%