2016
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p4265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic group and horns presence in injuries and economic losses of bovine carcasses

Abstract: Assessment of carcass bruises in steers and cull females, classified during unloading at the slaughterhouse according to genetic dominance in zebu and taurine cattle, and the presence of horns, including polled, horned and mixed batches. We considered horned the batches that included more than 20% of horned animals and mixed the batches that included less than 20% horned animals. The data were collected in a commercial slaughterhouse and included 93 batches, with a total of 2,520 animals, from different region… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
14
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary function of horns is male competition for mates (Lundrigan 1996), but they are also used for protection against predators and to aid in competition for resources (Stankowich & Caro 2009), and they may be involved in thermoregulation (Pares-Casanova & Caballero 2014). However, domestic cattle with horns pose a risk to other cattle and handlers (Knierim et al 2015), and can result in economic losses because of damaged hides and bruised tissue which must be trimmed when the meat is processed (Mendonca et al 2016;Youngers et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary function of horns is male competition for mates (Lundrigan 1996), but they are also used for protection against predators and to aid in competition for resources (Stankowich & Caro 2009), and they may be involved in thermoregulation (Pares-Casanova & Caballero 2014). However, domestic cattle with horns pose a risk to other cattle and handlers (Knierim et al 2015), and can result in economic losses because of damaged hides and bruised tissue which must be trimmed when the meat is processed (Mendonca et al 2016;Youngers et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in the prevalence of carcass lesions may occur because of differences in methods used to diagnose and record hematomas (Huert et al, 2015). Using the method outlined by Frasão et al (2014), 89.6% of animals were found to present lesions, whereas using the method of Mendonça et al (2016) 66.10% of animals were found to have hematomas in their carcasses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Da Frasão et al (2014) found 682 bruises in 320 carcasses, corroborating the findings of the present study that also detected more than one hematoma per carcass. Mendonça et al (2016) studied the carcass contusions in zebu and taurine animals and obtained a mean of 2.31 and 1.74 contusions per animal, respectively. In this study, there was no distinction of races.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stable groups, the horn status itself is not necessarily related to bruising in cattle (Youngers et al., 2017). However, the presence of horns is one of the factors potentially contributing to bruises found in cattle carcasses (Mendonça et al., 2016). Bruising may occur at loading, during transport, but also after arrival at the slaughterhouse, e.g.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%