2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic gradient of a host–parasite pair along a river persisted ten years against physical mobility: Baltic Salmo salar vs. Gyrodactylus salaris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coevolution of hosts and parasites is a familiar concept in the literature (Ehrlich & Raven, ; Thompson, ), and the topics of host–parasite co‐adaptation and co‐extinction are now receiving increasing attention, as loss of species that are interdependent through mutualistic or parasitic interactions may have cascading effects across taxa in ecosystems worldwide (Dunn, Harris, Colwell, Koh, & Sodhi, ; Farrell, Stephens, Berrang‐Ford, Gittleman, & Davies, ; Koh et al, ). Genetic and phenotypic variation related to host–parasite interactions has been observed in terrestrial and aquatic species (Lagrue, Joannes, Poulin, & Blasco‐Costa, ; Mikheyev et al, ), including parasites of certain freshwater fishes (Dallas & Cornelius, ; Lumme, Anttila, Rintamäki, Koski, & Romakkaniemi, ; Raeymaekers, Wegner, Huyse, & Volckaert, ), and is especially well‐studied in plant–insect interactions (Althoff, Segraves, & Johnson, 2014). Relationships among populations of parasites and populations of hosts are complex and may be influenced by local biotic interactions such as competition for hosts or host immune or behavioural response, as well as biophysical properties of the environment (Janz, ; Laine, ; Thompson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coevolution of hosts and parasites is a familiar concept in the literature (Ehrlich & Raven, ; Thompson, ), and the topics of host–parasite co‐adaptation and co‐extinction are now receiving increasing attention, as loss of species that are interdependent through mutualistic or parasitic interactions may have cascading effects across taxa in ecosystems worldwide (Dunn, Harris, Colwell, Koh, & Sodhi, ; Farrell, Stephens, Berrang‐Ford, Gittleman, & Davies, ; Koh et al, ). Genetic and phenotypic variation related to host–parasite interactions has been observed in terrestrial and aquatic species (Lagrue, Joannes, Poulin, & Blasco‐Costa, ; Mikheyev et al, ), including parasites of certain freshwater fishes (Dallas & Cornelius, ; Lumme, Anttila, Rintamäki, Koski, & Romakkaniemi, ; Raeymaekers, Wegner, Huyse, & Volckaert, ), and is especially well‐studied in plant–insect interactions (Althoff, Segraves, & Johnson, 2014). Relationships among populations of parasites and populations of hosts are complex and may be influenced by local biotic interactions such as competition for hosts or host immune or behavioural response, as well as biophysical properties of the environment (Janz, ; Laine, ; Thompson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. salaris infected 33% of the sedentary juveniles (parr) and 82% of the sea-migrating juveniles (smolts). The local parr populations were apparently not infected via the migrating adults or smolts, but the infection was maintained in the nursery rapids via transmission between sedentary juveniles aged 0-4 years (Lumme et al 2016a). The older parr were more often infected than the first year fry (Anttila et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The older parr were more often infected than the first year fry (Anttila et al 2008). The smolts arriving at the river mouth still carried parasite clones from home, and parasite exchange was limited even in the crowded smolt trap (Lumme et al 2016a). The conclusion is that spatial genetic differentiation is maintained by local coadaptation of the host and parasite despite the migration of fish from the upper to the lower Tornio River.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations