2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2021.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic gains with genomic versus phenotypic selection for drought and waterlogging tolerance in tropical maize (Zea mays L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of RCGS was initially assessed in a temperate maize biparental mapping population, with higher realized genetic gains for indices of stover and grain yield from RCGS in comparison to MARS . Superior response was also reported in tropical maize multiparental populations with cycles of RCGS for drought and waterlogging stress (Zhang et al 2017, Das et al 2020, Das et al 2021. For example, Zhang et al (2017) performed four cycles and obtained genetic gain for grain yield of 0.225 t ha −1 per cycle, which is equivalent to 0.100 t ha −1 year −1 over 4.5 years from the initial cross to the last cycle.…”
Section: Ca Wartha and Aj Lorenzmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effectiveness of RCGS was initially assessed in a temperate maize biparental mapping population, with higher realized genetic gains for indices of stover and grain yield from RCGS in comparison to MARS . Superior response was also reported in tropical maize multiparental populations with cycles of RCGS for drought and waterlogging stress (Zhang et al 2017, Das et al 2020, Das et al 2021. For example, Zhang et al (2017) performed four cycles and obtained genetic gain for grain yield of 0.225 t ha −1 per cycle, which is equivalent to 0.100 t ha −1 year −1 over 4.5 years from the initial cross to the last cycle.…”
Section: Ca Wartha and Aj Lorenzmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Other studies demonstrated similar responses to selection per cycle with GS and PS, but with a shorter cycle and reduced costs under GS (Table 1). With the goal of conserving genetic diversity while achieving high genetic gains, Zhang et al (2017) implemented GS in multi-parental tropical maize populations originating from crossing among 18 CIMMYT (International Center for Maize and Wheat Improvement) elite lines (Zhang et al 2017) and CIMMYT-Asia synthetic populations (Das et al 2020, Das et al 2021. In this sense, the CIMMYT maize breeding program is developing a phased GS implementation with a test-half-predict-half (THPH) strategy that has been cost effective since 2018 (Beyene et al 2019, Atanda et al 2021.…”
Section: Genomic Selection Implementation In the Public Sector For Cu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those lines with high yield and high GEBVs in the safflower collection could be selected directly to achieve yield gain. Selection in the stressed environment, especially for drought resistance, has been reported to improve the selection in optimal conditions ( Das et al, 2021 ; Kumar et al, 2021 ). However, we observed the selection in the RF and LR sites leads to the compromised gain for GY in IR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study the authors reported realized grain yield from cycle 1 to cycle 4 reached 0.100 tons ha -1 yr -1 over a 4.5-yr breeding period from the initial cross to the last cycle with a minimal loss of genetic diversity during the last cycle of genomic selection. Recently, Das et al (2020) used rapid cycle genomic selection to improve drought and waterlogging tolerance in two multi-parent yellow synthetic maize populations in Asia. This study showed that realized genetic gains after two cycles of rapid cycle recombination of genomic selection under drought stress were 0.110-and 0.135-tons ha −1 yr −1 , respectively, and 0.038-and 0.113-tons ha −1 yr −1 under waterlogging in two populations, respectively.…”
Section: Current Status Of Rapid Cycle Genomic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%