2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(03)00237-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic fuzzy system for damage detection in beams and helicopter rotor blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary advantage of genetic fuzzy over traditional fuzzy system is that when the number of parameters of input and output function of a system increases, GF system provides an easy solution for the model as compared to the fuzzy network which gets plagiarized when complexity increases. This work was validated by Pawar [13] in his work for damage detection of beams and blades of a helicopter rotor. They considered a non-uniform beam and BO-105 hinge less rotor blade of a helicopter for testing purposes.…”
Section: A Genetic-fuzzy Analysismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The primary advantage of genetic fuzzy over traditional fuzzy system is that when the number of parameters of input and output function of a system increases, GF system provides an easy solution for the model as compared to the fuzzy network which gets plagiarized when complexity increases. This work was validated by Pawar [13] in his work for damage detection of beams and blades of a helicopter rotor. They considered a non-uniform beam and BO-105 hinge less rotor blade of a helicopter for testing purposes.…”
Section: A Genetic-fuzzy Analysismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Let N T be the no. of samples to be tested and out of that if the system correctly classifies N C times then success rate of the system for the fuzzy rule as a percentage is given by Eq.4 [16]. By observation of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without preknown model knowledge and complicated designing progress under mathematic theory, the simple model-free controller maybe gain more extensive use. Unfortunately, as other controllers with GA optimization [11][12][13][14][15][16], it lacks instrict mathematic theory support especially convergence stability proof.…”
Section: Experimental Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve better performance and improved robustness, neural networks [8], adaptive learning [9,10], and the genetic algorithm (GA) [11,12] are being used in designing such controllers. A lot of studies proposed that merged techniques provide a more accurate and robust solution than that derived from any single technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%