2008
DOI: 10.3103/s1068367408010175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic features of Kazakh sheep breeds according to microsatellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The product size (bp) varied from 71 for OARCP20 to 288 for ILSTS11 in both the breeds. From the literature studied, Arora and Bhatia (2004, Farid et al(2000), Girish et al (2007), Nanekarani et al (2010) and Prema et al (2008aPrema et al ( , 2008b reported a lower mean number of alleles while the authors Arora et al (2010), Chen et al (2009), Diez-Tascon et al (2000, Jyotsana et al (2010), Ozerov et al (2008), Radha et al (2011) andRodrigo et al (2010) reported higher number of alleles than the present findings. The differences in allele number and size may be attributable to the study of unrelated local populations spread over distant geographical area, which harboured high degree of genetic variation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The product size (bp) varied from 71 for OARCP20 to 288 for ILSTS11 in both the breeds. From the literature studied, Arora and Bhatia (2004, Farid et al(2000), Girish et al (2007), Nanekarani et al (2010) and Prema et al (2008aPrema et al ( , 2008b reported a lower mean number of alleles while the authors Arora et al (2010), Chen et al (2009), Diez-Tascon et al (2000, Jyotsana et al (2010), Ozerov et al (2008), Radha et al (2011) andRodrigo et al (2010) reported higher number of alleles than the present findings. The differences in allele number and size may be attributable to the study of unrelated local populations spread over distant geographical area, which harboured high degree of genetic variation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…With the advantages of high PIC, uniform distribution in genome, and easy location, the microsatellite markers have been widely used in genetic map construction, gene location, relative relationship identification, population genetic structure analysis and marker assisted selection, etc. The polymorphic analysis of microsatellite markers played an important role in assessment of sheep genetic diversity and classification, conservation and utilization of breeds, and has been widely applied to study the genetic variation of different sheep breeds (Gizaw et al, 2007;Ozerov et al, 2008;Glowatzki-Mullis et al, 2009;Maria et al, 2010;Arora et al, 2011;Zhao et al, 2011;Sun et al, 2011;Al-Barzinji et al, 2011;Tolonea et al, 2012;Ghazy et al, 2013). Recently, Soma et al (2012) analyzed population genetic structure of the South African sheep breeds by microsatellite markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our results all loci were polymorphic with the number of alleles per locus ranging from 5 at MAF35 to 26 at BM1314 (Figure 1). Ozerov et al (2008) The average number of alleles per locus varied between 3.9 (MAF35) and 8.5 (CSSM43) ( Table 2). Allele frequencies are available from the authors on request.…”
Section: Microsatellite Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellites are excellent genetic markers because of their locus identity, high PIC value, widespread distribution in the genome, multi-allelism, co-dominant inheritance and PCR basis. In the last decades microsatellites have been used in many studies for determination of genetic difference and genetic variation among sheep breeds (Farid et al, 2000;Li et al, 2004;Gladyr et al, 2005;Gizaw et al, 2007;Ozerov et al, 2008;Glowatzki-Mullis et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%