2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132811
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Evaluation of Dual-Purpose Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in Colombia Using Principal Component Analysis

Abstract: Genealogy and productive information of 48621 dual-purpose buffaloes born in Colombia between years 1996 and 2014 was used. The following traits were assessed using one-trait models: milk yield at 270 days (MY270), age at first calving (AFC), weaning weight (WW), and weights at the following ages: first year (W12), 18 months (W18), and 2 years (W24). Direct additive genetic and residual random effects were included in all the traits. Maternal permanent environmental and maternal additive genetic effects were i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The AFC heritability estimate using the standard animal model was 0.196. This value is close to those found by other authors, which ranged from 0.170 to 0.260 for buffaloes (Agudelo‐Gomez, Pineda‐Sierra, & Cerón‐Muñoz, ; Catillo, Moioli, & Napolitano, ; Thiruvenkadan, Panneerselvam, & Murali, ). On the other hand, the heritability in the reaction norm increased considerably with the improvement of environmental conditions (Figure ), ranged from 0.178 to 0.364 for the GAFC and 0.131 to 0.394 for the GMY, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The AFC heritability estimate using the standard animal model was 0.196. This value is close to those found by other authors, which ranged from 0.170 to 0.260 for buffaloes (Agudelo‐Gomez, Pineda‐Sierra, & Cerón‐Muñoz, ; Catillo, Moioli, & Napolitano, ; Thiruvenkadan, Panneerselvam, & Murali, ). On the other hand, the heritability in the reaction norm increased considerably with the improvement of environmental conditions (Figure ), ranged from 0.178 to 0.364 for the GAFC and 0.131 to 0.394 for the GMY, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Oliveira et al (2014) applied the PCA technique to the genetic evaluation of 9 traits in Murrah Buffaloes finding that only the first 4 PCs were necessary to explain the covariance structure of the features. Furthermore, Agudelo-Gómez et al (2015) reported that the first three PCs from eight reproductive features in dual purpose buffaloes in Colombia presented eigenvalues higher than one, which explained 65.8% of the total variation. Vohra et al (2015) concluded that the first four components from 13 different body measurements of Gojri Buffaloes were sufficient to explain 70.9% of the total variation.…”
Section: Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to find some body traits about buffaloes in literature (Espinosa-Núnês et al 2011;Johari et al 2009;Vohra et al 2015;Mirza et al 2015;Dhillod et al (2017), but studies about the correlation between them are scarce, although they are very important to genetic improvement programmes. As reported by Agudelo-Gómez et al (2015), the body measurements of female buffaloes and their correlations can aid in predicting the potential and aptitudes of these animals. There is some association between the body measurements, the productive and reproductive traits in buffaloes (Thomas and Chakravarty 2000;Espinosa-Núnês et al 2011;Kern et al 2014) and in cattle (Wenceslau et al 2000;Rennó et al 2003;Lagrotta et al 2010;Silva et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%