2001
DOI: 10.2527/jas2001.79e-supple190x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic evaluation for beef carcass traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
36
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
36
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, as carcass weight increases fat content also increases (Keane and Allen, 1999;Drennan et al, 2005;Kirkland et al, 2006), but the results in the present study indicate that selection on BCI leads to increased weight but decreased fat content, which is desirable. One likely explanation is, while there is a positive genetic correlation between carcass weight and fatness (Marshall, 1994;Gregory et al, 1995;Bertrand et al, 2001;Hickey et al, 2007) the directions of the economic values assigned to each trait in the index differ so that, in this case, selection response is positive for carcass weight and negative for fat. Also, some of these interactions, e.g.…”
Section: Beef Carcass Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, as carcass weight increases fat content also increases (Keane and Allen, 1999;Drennan et al, 2005;Kirkland et al, 2006), but the results in the present study indicate that selection on BCI leads to increased weight but decreased fat content, which is desirable. One likely explanation is, while there is a positive genetic correlation between carcass weight and fatness (Marshall, 1994;Gregory et al, 1995;Bertrand et al, 2001;Hickey et al, 2007) the directions of the economic values assigned to each trait in the index differ so that, in this case, selection response is positive for carcass weight and negative for fat. Also, some of these interactions, e.g.…”
Section: Beef Carcass Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though positive phenotypic correlations between carcass backfat thickness and marbling score have been reported (Hamilton 1995;Crews and Kemp 2001), it is known that such correlations usually result when cattle are slaughtered at higher levels of finish and that backfat thickness, by itself, may account for only a small proportion of the variation in marbling (Bertrand et al 2001).…”
Section: Et Al (2002) Lines Based On British Breeds (Angus Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the correlation between backfat thickness and marbling score has been reported to be either very low in magnitude or not different from zero (Bertrand et al 2001;Boyles 2002). Though positive phenotypic correlations between carcass backfat thickness and marbling score have been reported (Hamilton 1995;Crews and Kemp 2001), it is known that such correlations usually result when cattle are slaughtered at higher levels of finish and that backfat thickness, by itself, may account for only a small proportion of the variation in marbling (Bertrand et al 2001).…”
Section: Et Al (2002) Lines Based On British Breeds (Angus Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations