2019
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201809958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic engineering of hematopoiesis: current stage of clinical translation and future perspectives

Abstract: Here I review the scientific background, current stage of development and future perspectives that I foresee in the field of genetic manipulation of hematopoietic stem cells with a special emphasis on clinical applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(182 reference statements)
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of genome editing to SCID and other PIDs is obviously an attractive option, because the end product would (in most cases) result from expression of the right gene in the right place, i.e., in its physiological environment (Porteus, 2019; Naldini, 2019). This is important for both safety and efficacy.…”
Section: Conclusion and The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of genome editing to SCID and other PIDs is obviously an attractive option, because the end product would (in most cases) result from expression of the right gene in the right place, i.e., in its physiological environment (Porteus, 2019; Naldini, 2019). This is important for both safety and efficacy.…”
Section: Conclusion and The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…New precision techniques based on gene editing are being developed preclinically and have been recently applied in vitro and in vivo through the use of specific endonucleases . Although very promising, many aspects related to the safety and effectiveness of gene editing have yet to be verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With gene editing, genes can be targeted and corrected in situ by enzymes that catalyze the breaking of the double helix of DNA. This can be achieved through meganucleases, Zinc‐finger nucleases (ZFN), transcriptor activator‐like effector nucleases (TALENs) and clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeats CRISPR‐associated (CRISPR/Cas) based RNA‐guided DNA endonucleases …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because infused hCD34+ HSPC dose correlates with time to engraftment and this is limited in UCB, efforts to enhance HSPCs in UCB units have included appropriate donor UCB selection, the use of a second UCB or haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donation for HSCTs, ex vivo UCB HSPC expansion before transplant and up regulating homing and/or bone marrow retention cell surface molecules on the UCB HSPCs . In the latter two instances, thawed UCB with or without hCD34+ or hCD133+ HSPC enrichment are cultured for relatively short periods of time (typically 12 h to 21 days) in serum‐free, cytokine and/or small molecule–supplemented media . In the majority of cases, isolation of hCD133+ or hCD34+ HSPCs from fresh UCB for preclinical studies has achieved high purities, viabilities, and recoveries .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%