“…At present time wild grapevine has become rather rare due to several forms of human disturbance, such as habitat destruction and fragmentation, silvicultural practices, diffusion of pathogens (e.g., oïdium, phylloxera, mildew, and viruses), improper management of natural environment, and hybridization with domestic forms (Arrigo and Arnold, 2007; Zecca et al, 2010; Garfi et al, 2013; Pacifico et al, 2016; Arnold et al, 2017). Gene flow between wild and cultivated grapevines was confirmed in several countries such as Spain (Arroyo-García et al, 2006; De Andrés et al, 2012), Italy (Zecca et al, 2010) and Georgia (Ekhvaia et al, 2014). In the last years, molecular methods based on the use of microsatellite (SSR) (This et al, 2004; Grassi et al, 2008; Carimi et al, 2011; Lacombe et al, 2013; Emanuelli et al, 2013) and, more recently, on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers (Salmaso et al, 2004; Myles et al, 2011; Emanuelli et al, 2013; Laucou et al, 2018; De Lorenzis et al, 2019), as well as on genome sequencing (Zhou et al, 2017) allowed not only to improve the discrimination between wild and cultivated populations, but also to study the relationships among different cultivated varieties and wild accessions.…”