2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-014-0125-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity of Vitis vinifera in Georgia: relationships between local cultivars and wild grapevine, V. vinifera L. subsp. sylvestris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the genetic composition of feral apple populations and their relationships to commercially grown cultivars and native species. Similar analyses have been performed on other plant species, such as grape (De Andrés et al, ; Ekhvaia, Gurushidze, Blattner, & Akhalkatsi, ), and the Callery pear (Culley & Hardiman, ). These studies found genetic relationships between cultivars and wild samples easy to resolve due to high divergence between wild and cultivated populations (De Andrés et al, ), and relatively few cultivars contributing to feral populations (Culley & Hardiman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the genetic composition of feral apple populations and their relationships to commercially grown cultivars and native species. Similar analyses have been performed on other plant species, such as grape (De Andrés et al, ; Ekhvaia, Gurushidze, Blattner, & Akhalkatsi, ), and the Callery pear (Culley & Hardiman, ). These studies found genetic relationships between cultivars and wild samples easy to resolve due to high divergence between wild and cultivated populations (De Andrés et al, ), and relatively few cultivars contributing to feral populations (Culley & Hardiman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…of putative secondary domestication centers along the main migration routes due to genetic relationships between wild and cultivated accessions, especially in the Mediterranean Basin and Central Asia (Grassi et al, 2003;Arroyo-García et al, 2006;Myles et al, 2011;Zhou et al, 2017;Riaz et al, 2018). The coexistence of wild populations together with domesticated ones is often and the bidirectional gene flow (wild-to-cultivated and cultivated-towild) has been well documented (De Andrés et al, 2012;Ekhvaia et al, 2014;Riaz et al, 2018;D'Onofrio, 2020;Maraš et al, 2020), supporting the occurrence of secondary domestication events from local wild populations or introgression events. These events, the geographical origin and human usage were found to strongly shape the genetic structure of grapevine germplasm (Bacilieri et al, 2013).…”
Section: South Caucasus the First Grapevine Domestication Centermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At present time wild grapevine has become rather rare due to several forms of human disturbance, such as habitat destruction and fragmentation, silvicultural practices, diffusion of pathogens (e.g., oïdium, phylloxera, mildew, and viruses), improper management of natural environment, and hybridization with domestic forms (Arrigo and Arnold, 2007; Zecca et al, 2010; Garfi et al, 2013; Pacifico et al, 2016; Arnold et al, 2017). Gene flow between wild and cultivated grapevines was confirmed in several countries such as Spain (Arroyo-García et al, 2006; De Andrés et al, 2012), Italy (Zecca et al, 2010) and Georgia (Ekhvaia et al, 2014). In the last years, molecular methods based on the use of microsatellite (SSR) (This et al, 2004; Grassi et al, 2008; Carimi et al, 2011; Lacombe et al, 2013; Emanuelli et al, 2013) and, more recently, on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers (Salmaso et al, 2004; Myles et al, 2011; Emanuelli et al, 2013; Laucou et al, 2018; De Lorenzis et al, 2019), as well as on genome sequencing (Zhou et al, 2017) allowed not only to improve the discrimination between wild and cultivated populations, but also to study the relationships among different cultivated varieties and wild accessions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%