The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.4236/ojgen.2016.61003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity of the Endemic Xantus’ Hummingbird Using 16 Novel Polymorphic Microsatellite Loci, and Their Cross Amplification between Six Related Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observed heterozygosities ranged from 0.03 to 0.56 (mean Ho ± SD: 0.16 ± 0.05) and expected heterozygosities from 0.03 to 0.67 (mean He ± SD: 0.25 ± 0.06, Table 1). These heterozygosities were low when compared to that of phylogenetically close species, though the microsatellites used in the reference literature where not the same as those designed and tested in this study (Lance et al 2009, González et al 2010, Oyler-McCance et al 2011, Gutiérrez-Rodriguez et al 2013, Sanvicente et al 2016; Table 2). Several attempts of amplification using two hummingbird microsatellites developed in other studies, Acya3-3 andHxan07 (Gutiérrez-Rodriguez et al 2013, Sanvicente et al 2016), were done by RNB, with different settings of temperature and thermocycling conditions, but resulted in no amplifications for Sooty and Whitecollared Swifts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Observed heterozygosities ranged from 0.03 to 0.56 (mean Ho ± SD: 0.16 ± 0.05) and expected heterozygosities from 0.03 to 0.67 (mean He ± SD: 0.25 ± 0.06, Table 1). These heterozygosities were low when compared to that of phylogenetically close species, though the microsatellites used in the reference literature where not the same as those designed and tested in this study (Lance et al 2009, González et al 2010, Oyler-McCance et al 2011, Gutiérrez-Rodriguez et al 2013, Sanvicente et al 2016; Table 2). Several attempts of amplification using two hummingbird microsatellites developed in other studies, Acya3-3 andHxan07 (Gutiérrez-Rodriguez et al 2013, Sanvicente et al 2016), were done by RNB, with different settings of temperature and thermocycling conditions, but resulted in no amplifications for Sooty and Whitecollared Swifts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%