2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity of Main Inbred Indica Rice Varieties Applied in Guangdong Province as Revealed by Molecular Marker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A microsatellite marker having a PIC value of greater than 0.5 is highly informative (Botstein et al 1980). The average PIC values of 0.33 (Singh et al 2004), 0.32 (Ming et al 2015), 0.32 (Gour et al 2017) and 0.26 (Mvuyekure et al 2018), reported previously. Pachauri et al 2013, obtained the mean PIC value of 0.37 in sets of 14 improved varieties and 27 landraces of rice collected from different zones of seven Indian states, which were comparable to the present result.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A microsatellite marker having a PIC value of greater than 0.5 is highly informative (Botstein et al 1980). The average PIC values of 0.33 (Singh et al 2004), 0.32 (Ming et al 2015), 0.32 (Gour et al 2017) and 0.26 (Mvuyekure et al 2018), reported previously. Pachauri et al 2013, obtained the mean PIC value of 0.37 in sets of 14 improved varieties and 27 landraces of rice collected from different zones of seven Indian states, which were comparable to the present result.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…These numbers were quite comparable to 2.0-5.5 alleles per SSR locus (Cho et al 2000) using a different set of rice germplasm. A range of 2-4 alleles per locus was reported (Gour et al 2017; Ming et al 2015; Mvuyekure et al 2018; Verma et al 2019). The average number of alleles was 6.72 (Ravi et al 2003), 4.90 (Zeng 2004), 4.50 (Pervaiz et al 2010), 8.00 (Zhao et al 2009), 4.30 (Islam et al 2011), 7.40 (Shamim et al 2015) and 6.40 (Watanabe et al 2016), which might be due to the use of a more diverse set of rice accessions in their study or due to the use of highly polymorphic markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is prominent to explore the genetic variation within a rice population, for the management and utilization of rice germplasm. That could be further used for the improvement and development of new rice varieties [39]. Traditionally the use of morphological or physiological traits were used to evaluate the genetic diversity in plants but this technique was not trustworthy as this procedure was dependent upon the environment due to the gene expression in uenced by it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%