2020
DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2020.152.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity of Five Lathyrus Species using RAPD, ISSR and SCoT Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the three types of DNA markers employed in this study, RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT, differ in the nature of the evolutionary mechanisms underlying their variation and their distribution in the genome (Osman and Ali 2020). According to our results, the detected average of polymorphism percent was 85%, 79.25%, and 69.44 for RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT markers, respectively, indicating the very high discriminating ability of the studied techniques and genotypes.…”
Section: Figure (4)mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…On the other hand, the three types of DNA markers employed in this study, RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT, differ in the nature of the evolutionary mechanisms underlying their variation and their distribution in the genome (Osman and Ali 2020). According to our results, the detected average of polymorphism percent was 85%, 79.25%, and 69.44 for RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT markers, respectively, indicating the very high discriminating ability of the studied techniques and genotypes.…”
Section: Figure (4)mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…[21] revealed that the SCoT marker produced higher polymorphism (36.14%), PIC (0.142) and Rp (1.88) value as compared with the ISSR marker polymorphism (23-25%), PIC (0.088) and Rp value (1.55). On contrary, Osman and Ali [22] found slightly higher polymorphism (96.81%) and PIC (0.305) for the ISSR marker as compared with SCoT marker (polymorphism; 96% PIC;0.302) and RAPD marker (polymorphism; 94.2%, PIC;0.301). However, Collard and Mackill [23] suggested the use of SCoT markers being highly reproducible and more useful for targeted quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Another explanation could be the low reproducibility of RAPDs [70]. In this respect, Osman and Ali [71] indicated that ISSR and SCoT markers are considered powerful markers for the discrimination and identification of five studied Lathyrus species. Moreover, in a study by Akçal-Giachino [72], the RAPD and ISSR marker systems were found to be useful for determining genetic diversity in P. anisum L. and identifying variations among landraces.…”
Section: Genetic Variations Revealed By Rapd and Issr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%