2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium, and association mapping analyses of Gossypium barbadense L. germplasm

Abstract: Limited polymorphism and narrow genetic base, due to genetic bottleneck through historic domestication, highlight a need for comprehensive characterization and utilization of existing genetic diversity in cotton germplasm collections. In this study, 288 worldwide Gossypium barbadense L. cotton germplasm accessions were evaluated in two diverse environments (Uzbekistan and USA). These accessions were assessed for genetic diversity, population structure, linkage disequilibrium (LD), and LD-based association mapp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(155 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 47 (i.e., 48%) and 50 (i.e., 52%) SSR markers were located over all the 13 chromosomes of A- and D-genome each, respectively. A total of 293 different alleles were amplified by the present panel of SSRs, ranging from 2 to 5 alleles per marker with an average value of 3.020 alleles per marker, which is lower than as reported by Abdullaev et al (2017) and Baytar et al (2017) . The results for the number of alleles for markers depend on the panel of germplasm, but these are also highly affected even by the methods used for screening of results like PAGE, AGE, MAZE, micro-capillary, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A total of 47 (i.e., 48%) and 50 (i.e., 52%) SSR markers were located over all the 13 chromosomes of A- and D-genome each, respectively. A total of 293 different alleles were amplified by the present panel of SSRs, ranging from 2 to 5 alleles per marker with an average value of 3.020 alleles per marker, which is lower than as reported by Abdullaev et al (2017) and Baytar et al (2017) . The results for the number of alleles for markers depend on the panel of germplasm, but these are also highly affected even by the methods used for screening of results like PAGE, AGE, MAZE, micro-capillary, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…These markers could be used in other studies too for the screening of lint-and fiber-related traits. SSR markers have shown similar linkage and pleiotropic effect in previous studies of Abdullaev et al (2017), Rahman (2017), andZhang et al (2020). Use of these markers showing linkage and pleiotropic effect in cotton will be very helpful in the screening of progenies in crop improvement programs specific to yield and other yield attributing traits.…”
Section: Association Mappingmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selection, recombination, mutation, genetic drift, mating systems and population relatedness are all major factors, which influence linkage disequilibrium [3739]. The fact that varieties show significantly overall higher LD compared to landraces, in particular in the D genome, is likely the result of selection during breeding for important agronomic traits [40, 41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past 20 years, researchers have identified a large number of QTLs related to fiber quality in G. barbadense using interspecific segregating populations of G. hirsutum × G. barbadense or natural populations of G. barbadense (Abdullaev et al 2017;Said et al 2015a), but most of the mapping populations are early segregating populations of G. hirsutum × G. barbadense such as F 2 populations (Jiang et al 1998;Kohel et al 2001;Lin et al 2005;Mei et al 2004;Paterson et al 2003), F 2:3 populations (He et al 2007) and early backcross generation populations (BC 1 , BC 2 , BC 2 S 1 ) (Lacape et al 2005;Shi et al 2015. A few mapping populations are recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations (Lacape et al 2009(Lacape et al , 2010 or backcross introgression line (BIL) populations (Nie et al 2015;Yu et al 2013), as well as natural populations of G. barbadense (Abdullaev et al 2017;Wang et al 2013a). Due to the complex background of these mapping populations, it is difficult to accurately identify and precisely locate QTLs (Islam et al 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%