2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12298-008-0038-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity in Indian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers

Abstract: Genetic diversity of twenty-six common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions of diverse geographical origin was studied using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Fifteen out of forty four primers screened showed polymorphism across present set of genotypes. A total of 124 amplicons were scored using these 15 primers. Ninety five percent of the amplified products showed polymorphism, indicating fair amount of variation at the DNA level among these accessions. Cluster analysis delineated the genot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the real genetic variation among genotypes, a marker system that generates more markers from the genome should be used in order to get information as much as possible throughout the genome. In the current study, with much higher numbers of SNPs in comparison with other methods (Kumar et al, 2008a(Kumar et al, , 2008bCabral et al, 2011) for common bean, as well as other crops (Jarquin et al, 2014), DArTseq methods detected many more SNPs per reaction than did SSRs . Recently, Schröder et al (2016) carried out an experiment on different combinations of enzymes on SNP discovery of common bean.…”
Section: Snp Discovery By Dartseqmentioning
confidence: 39%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To understand the real genetic variation among genotypes, a marker system that generates more markers from the genome should be used in order to get information as much as possible throughout the genome. In the current study, with much higher numbers of SNPs in comparison with other methods (Kumar et al, 2008a(Kumar et al, , 2008bCabral et al, 2011) for common bean, as well as other crops (Jarquin et al, 2014), DArTseq methods detected many more SNPs per reaction than did SSRs . Recently, Schröder et al (2016) carried out an experiment on different combinations of enzymes on SNP discovery of common bean.…”
Section: Snp Discovery By Dartseqmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…Common bean accessions #47 (Bandırma/Turkey, dwarf) and #82 (Havsa-Edirne/ Turkey, dwarf) in population II (Andean) were the most genetically similar (0.002) among all accessions. Notably, these values between high and low genetic diversity were broader than the genetic diversity level documented in earlier common bean studies (Kumar et al, 2008a(Kumar et al, , 2008bMaras et al, 2008;Nemli et al, 2015;Perseguini et al, 2015). This information obtained by genetic similarity could be acceptable as a permanent scientific foundation for the faster use of germplasm collections in plant improvement.…”
Section: Analysis Of Genetic Diversity and Population Structurementioning
confidence: 80%
“…For example, it was determined that there is a high hybridization frequency in central Europe but low frequencies in Spain and Italy [5]. In Africa, the landraces are frequently grouped into Andean and Mesoamerican genepools with few introgressions among these groups [6], and this pattern of diversity was also detected in China and India [7,8]. However, the diversity of the common bean has been studied less in Asia and Africa than in Europe and the Americas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the area reported by FAO statistics may include other bean species such as mung bean ( Vigna radiata ), so the effective area under common bean in the region will be at a maximum around 1 M ha for winter or summer cultivation. Historical cultivation records are sparse, although diversity is found in the Himalayas (Tiwari et al , 2005; Sharma et al , 2006) as well as in other regions of India (Kumar et al , 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%