2017
DOI: 10.18782/2320-7051.2768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity in Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] Accessions using Protein Profiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the biochemical markers, SDS-PAGE shows better validity and ease for ascertaining genetic diversity of crop species and consequently it is employed in a wide range of crops for diversity analysis 10 . The SDS-PAGE profile of seed storage proteins has been used by several researchers for the assessment of genetic variability in cowpea 11 . However, the use of SDS-PAGE for the evaluation of genetic variability in the mutagenized populations of cowpea is very meagre.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the biochemical markers, SDS-PAGE shows better validity and ease for ascertaining genetic diversity of crop species and consequently it is employed in a wide range of crops for diversity analysis 10 . The SDS-PAGE profile of seed storage proteins has been used by several researchers for the assessment of genetic variability in cowpea 11 . However, the use of SDS-PAGE for the evaluation of genetic variability in the mutagenized populations of cowpea is very meagre.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parents / genotypes used in the study were different released varieties, therefore, it was thought justified to determine their differences among themselves on the basis of the profile of their seed storage proteins. Characterization of genotypes based on seed storage protein/subunits is well documented in different groups of crops such as blackgram (Ghafoor and Ahmad, 2005;Ghafoor et al, 2002), Capsicum annuum L. (Anu and Peter, 2003), Solanum (Menella et al, 1999), Vignaspp (Rao et al, 1992;Sharma, 2012;Chaoudhary, 2013) and Wheat (Siddiqui and Naz, 2009), including mustard (Rabbani et al, 2001;Geetha and Balamurugan, 2011;Mukhlesure and Hirata, 2004;Parashar, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversity existing in germplasms of crops collected from diverse growing regions need to be properly characterized and evaluated to improve strategies for conservation and utilization towards cultivar development (Parashar et al, 2015;Sharma and Krishna, 2017). Several strategies have been adopted for germplasm characterization including the use of morphological markers (Kancherla and Bhalla, 2003), seed storage protein markers and DNA molecular markers (Rahman and Hirata, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike morphological markers (Siddiqui and Naz, 2009), the banding patterns of protein markers are stable (Iqbal et al, 2005;Nasar et al, 2006;Iqbal et al, 2014). Due to these benefits, protein markers have been widely applied in the analysis of genetic diversity within and between accessions, in studying plant domestication in relation to genetic resource conservation and breeding, and in establishing genome relationships (Kakaei and Kahrizi, 2011;Hameed et al, 2012;Sharma and Krishna, 2017). Seed storage protein profiling has been used in investigating diversity among selected varieties of Brassica napus (Nasar et al, 2006;Choudhary et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation