2014
DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2014.3028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity and Variability in two Italian Autochthonous Donkey Genetic Types Assessed by Microsatellite Markers

Abstract: Since 13 rd century, Italian domestic autochthonous donkey population has been characterised by Mediterranean grey mousy cruciate ancestral phenotype, currently typical of Amiata donkey (AD) genetic type. This phenotype persisted up to the 16 th century when a marked introduction of Hispanic and French big sized and dark bay or darkish coloured sires occurred. In the context of a safeguard programme of Latial Equide resources, the aim of this research was to evaluate the genetic diversity and similarity betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in this study we used genetic profiles at the nuclear DNA level of only seven adult Banat donkey females, all the parameters of genetic diversity calculated for this group were similar or even higher compared to those observed in the two larger sub-populations of Balkan donkey females (Table 4), and also in populations of other donkey breeds distributed worldwide (Jordana, Folch & Sanchezm, 1999;Jordana et al, 2016;Aranguren-Mendez, Jordana & Gomez, 2001;Ivankovic et al, 2002;Blasi et al, 2005;Ciampolini et al, 2007;Zhu et al, 2013;Matassino et al, 2014;Rosenbom et al, 2015). Furthermore, two private alleles were observed in Banat donkeys characterized also by the significant excess of heterozygotes.…”
Section: Genetic Characterization Of the Banat Donkeymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Although in this study we used genetic profiles at the nuclear DNA level of only seven adult Banat donkey females, all the parameters of genetic diversity calculated for this group were similar or even higher compared to those observed in the two larger sub-populations of Balkan donkey females (Table 4), and also in populations of other donkey breeds distributed worldwide (Jordana, Folch & Sanchezm, 1999;Jordana et al, 2016;Aranguren-Mendez, Jordana & Gomez, 2001;Ivankovic et al, 2002;Blasi et al, 2005;Ciampolini et al, 2007;Zhu et al, 2013;Matassino et al, 2014;Rosenbom et al, 2015). Furthermore, two private alleles were observed in Banat donkeys characterized also by the significant excess of heterozygotes.…”
Section: Genetic Characterization Of the Banat Donkeymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As far as mean He of all loci be concerned, Chinese donkey breeds were similar to other highly diversified breeds in the Near East, northeast Africa (Rosenbom et al 2015), Spain (Aranguren-Mendez et al 2001), and Croatia (Ivankovic et al 2002), and more diversified than Italian (Bordonaro et al 2012;Colli et al 2013;Matassino et al 2014) and American (Jordana et al 2015) donkeys. For He of the same single locus in comparable studies, Chinese donkeys were also similar to or slightly higher than European (Aranguren-Mendez et al 2001;Jordana et al 2001;Ivankovic et al 2002;Bordonaro et al 2012;Colli et al 2013) and American (Jordana et al 2015) donkeys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…To date, the genetic diversity of indigenous donkey breeds in Spain (Aranguren-Mendez et al 2001;Aranguren-Mendez et al 2002), Croatia (Ivankovic et al 2002), Italy (Bordonaro et al 2012;Colli et al 2013;Matassino et al 2014), America (Jordana et al 2015), northeast Africa, the Near East and the Arabian Peninsula (Rosenbom et al 2015) has been evaluated using microsatellite markers, and these results of evaluation are crucial for making further conservation strategy. On the other hand, the origin of the species and evolutionary relationship between donkey breeds were analyzed using the mitochondrial DNA markers (Ivankovic et al 2002;Lopez Lopez et al 2005;Chen et al 2006;Zhang et al 2010;Han et al 2014;Perez-Pardal et al 2014), and these results hinted that the modern donkey (including Chinese donkey) has an African maternal origin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fstatistic values (F I S , fixation indices of subpopulation; F I T , fixation indices of total population; F ST , fixation index resulting from comparing subpopulations to the total population; Weir and Cockerham, 1984), together with the total number of alleles (At), were estimated with Arlequin version 3.1 (http://cmpg.unibe.ch/software/arlequin3, last access: 27 February 2019). The polymorphic information content (PIC) of each locus was calculated using PIC CALC (Nagy et al, 2012). The number of private alleles (NPA) was counted using the GDA program (https://download.csdn.net/ download/vip8_8/9856774, last access: 27 February 2019)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autosomal microsatellite markers have been widely used in revealing genetic variability and identifying the genetic relationships among donkey populations (Jordana et al, 2001;Matassino et al, 2014;Rosenbom et al, 2015). Bordonaro et al (2012) described the genetic variability and differentiation in Pantesco and two other Sicilian autochthonous donkey breeds by microsatellites makers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%