2011
DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and population structure of Glossina pallidipes in Uganda and western Kenya

Abstract: BackgroundGlossina pallidipes has been implicated in the spread of sleeping sickness from southeastern Uganda into Kenya. Recent studies indicated resurgence of G. pallidipes in Lambwe Valley and southeastern Uganda after what were deemed to be effective control efforts. It is unknown whether the G. pallidipes belt in southeastern Uganda extends into western Kenya. We investigated the genetic diversity and population structure of G. pallidipes in Uganda and western Kenya.ResultsAMOVA indicated that differences… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
28
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In clade A, for which we disposed of a reasonable sample size, isolation by distance slope and effective population size analyses suggested relatively small densities but quite large dispersal distances (2–8 km per generations on average and up to 14 km), which is not so different to what mark‐release recapture suggests for this species (Ouma, Marquez, & Krafsur, ). Isolation by distance was never accurately explored in the literature for this species, either because it was not really studied (Ouma et al, ; Ouma, Marquez, & Krafsur, ) or because it was analyzed with temporally heterogeneous subsamples (Okeyo et al, ). Clade B contained few and very small subsamples and the differences observed with Clade A might not be significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clade A, for which we disposed of a reasonable sample size, isolation by distance slope and effective population size analyses suggested relatively small densities but quite large dispersal distances (2–8 km per generations on average and up to 14 km), which is not so different to what mark‐release recapture suggests for this species (Ouma, Marquez, & Krafsur, ). Isolation by distance was never accurately explored in the literature for this species, either because it was not really studied (Ouma et al, ; Ouma, Marquez, & Krafsur, ) or because it was analyzed with temporally heterogeneous subsamples (Okeyo et al, ). Clade B contained few and very small subsamples and the differences observed with Clade A might not be significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, neighboring populations can vary in Wolbachia prevalence. Male-biased dispersal has been observed in G. pallidipes (50) and in G. fuscipes fuscipes (37). Furthermore, females are known to have multiple matings (10).…”
Section: Patterns Of Variation In Individual Microfauna Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The species in the palpalis group also have strong human host preferences, while the species in the morsitans complex typically have broader host specificity (63). Given that genetic data from Uganda suggest that tsetse individuals do not move for long distances (64,65), we assumed that flies captured in the same locations were likely to have been exposed to similar microenvironments. Thus, we reasoned that microbiota composition differences observed in individuals of the different species in MF may arise from biotic differences associated with blood-feeding preferences or genetic differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%