2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-019-00825-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and population structure of enset (Ensete ventricosum Welw Cheesman) landraces of Gurage zone, Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observations that cultivated ensets exhibited higher heterozygosity and Shannon's Index than wild enset resemble what have been reported for enset based on SSR markers study (Gerura et al , 2019) and for other plant species, including Camellia sinensis (Yang et al, 2016) and C. taliensis (Zhao et al, 2014). The high heterozygosity of cultivated enset might be due to vegetative propagation maintaining heterozygosity across clonal generations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our observations that cultivated ensets exhibited higher heterozygosity and Shannon's Index than wild enset resemble what have been reported for enset based on SSR markers study (Gerura et al , 2019) and for other plant species, including Camellia sinensis (Yang et al, 2016) and C. taliensis (Zhao et al, 2014). The high heterozygosity of cultivated enset might be due to vegetative propagation maintaining heterozygosity across clonal generations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results presented here indicate that cultivated and wild enset accessions exhibit similar gene diversity and polymorphic information content (PIC) (Table 4). This is similar to what has been reported based on SSR marker analysis of enset genetic diversity (Gerura et al , 2019), but differs from what has been reported by Olango et al (2015), which reported that higher gene diversity in cultivated enset population (0.59) than wild enset population (0.40), but similar hetrozygosity for cultivated and wild enset populatons (0.5). The genetic diversity for both cultivated and wild enset reported in the current study (Table 4) is lower than previous enset genetic diversity studies conducted using SSR makers (Getachew et al , 2014; Olango et al, 2015 ; Gerura et al , 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our results, moderate level of genetic diversity (H e = 0.47) was detected. A relatively higher H e values (0.55 and 0.59 ) of enset were reported [23] and [25,26] respectively. The value of I (0.74) in the current study was also lower as compared to the earlier report (1.08) [25].…”
Section: Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…SSR markers are highly polymorphic, co-dominant and the primer sequences are generally well conserved within and between related species [24]. Recently, Gerura et al [25] and Olango et al [26] have reported measurement of genetic diversity of enset using SSR markers. The previous studies were carried out on landraces from speci c locations, and there was no identi cation and diversity study on enset landraces used for traditional medicine, potentially another reservoir of diversity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%