2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:coge.0000006124.55109.5e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and population structure of Eugenia dysenterica DC. (``cagaiteira'' – Myrtaceae) in Central Brazil: Spatial analysis and implications for conservation and management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This contradicts the results of similar studies (e.g. Pires de Campos Telles et al . 2003; Hensen & Oberprieler 2005; Hensen et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contradicts the results of similar studies (e.g. Pires de Campos Telles et al . 2003; Hensen & Oberprieler 2005; Hensen et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This contradicts the results of similar studies (e.g. Pires de Campos Telles et al 2003;, but corresponds well to our assumption that we are not dealing with a plant species that was once widespread, but rather with…”
Section: Analysis Of Genetic Structuresupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Zucchi et al (2003Zucchi et al ( , 2005 interpreted the high Mantel correlation as an indicative of IBD, but actually many distinct ecological and evolutionary processes generate strong spatial patterns (see Meirmans, 2012). For instance, these analyses were based on overall multivariate distances, so it was not possible to infer processes from these more complex patterns of variation among loci (e.g., Sokal and Wartenberg, 1983;Diniz-Filho and Bini, 2012). Mantel correlation across species range observed here is actually lower than previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In this way, more optimal conservation management could be designed if significant intercepts are obtained from spatial autocorrelation analyses (Brauer, Unmack, Hammer, Adams, & Beheregaray, 2013;Campos Telles, Guedes Coelho, Chaves, Diniz-Filho, & D'Ayala Valva, 2003;Chung et al, 2006;Diniz-Filho & Campos Telles, 2002;Hrbek, Crossa, & Farias, 2007). In this way, more optimal conservation management could be designed if significant intercepts are obtained from spatial autocorrelation analyses (Brauer, Unmack, Hammer, Adams, & Beheregaray, 2013;Campos Telles, Guedes Coelho, Chaves, Diniz-Filho, & D'Ayala Valva, 2003;Chung et al, 2006;Diniz-Filho & Campos Telles, 2002;Hrbek, Crossa, & Farias, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%