1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02907356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and ecological distribution ofPhaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in northwestern South America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
102
1
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
102
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…A panel of 102 wild accessions of the common bean was selected to represent the geographical distribution of wild P. vulgaris from northern Mexico to northwestern Argentina. The accessions are representative of the different gene pools of the species: 49 Mesoamerican accessions (Mexico, Central America, and Colombia), 47 Andean accessions (South America), and 6 wild accessions from northern Peru and Ecuador that are characterized by the ancestral type I phaseolin (23,24). The accessions characterized by the type I phaseolin are from few small populations found in restricted geographic areas on the western slope of the Andes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A panel of 102 wild accessions of the common bean was selected to represent the geographical distribution of wild P. vulgaris from northern Mexico to northwestern Argentina. The accessions are representative of the different gene pools of the species: 49 Mesoamerican accessions (Mexico, Central America, and Colombia), 47 Andean accessions (South America), and 6 wild accessions from northern Peru and Ecuador that are characterized by the ancestral type I phaseolin (23,24). The accessions characterized by the type I phaseolin are from few small populations found in restricted geographic areas on the western slope of the Andes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, during domestication, important agronomic characters are selected which result in a genome-wide reduction of genetic diversity in the domesticates (Tanksley and McCouch 1997;Eyre-Walker et al 1998;Buckler et al 2001;Diamond 2002;Clark et al 2004;Papa et al 2007, Pozzi et al 2004Otero-Arnaiz et al 2005;Vasemagi et al 2005;Doebley et al 2006;Kilian et al 2007;Zhu et al 2007). Earlier studies in bean using DNA marker, protein and morphological variation, determined that domesticated landraces indeed contain a subset of the variability found in wild beans Debouck et al 1993;Kami et al 1995;Tohme et al 1996;Beebe et al 2001;Chacón et al 2005). Here we observed that the amount of variability/polymorphisms retained is similar to the diversity estimates found in wild types.…”
Section: A Model For Domestication In Common Beanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of the between genotypes from the southern range of wild and cultivated common beans in the Andes and would provide a possible explanation for the origin of the race from wild beans that do exist in Argentina but that do not exist in Chile (Santalla et al 2004). This point is important given the lack of evidence for a separate domestication leading to race Chile and the incongruence that this race may have arisen separately even though it has not been associated with specific wild accessions (Debouck et al 1993;Johns et al 1997;Chacón et al 2005). Our results may indicate that race Chile precursors moved from the primary center of origin in Northwestern Argentina across the Andes mountains into temperate latitudes in central Chile, a hypothesis that would be supported by results from Sonnante et al (1994) showing close relationship of race Chile genotypes with Argentine wild accessions.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity and Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introgression between races and between gene pools as well as potentially with wild accessions is the likely explanation for the high diversity observed in the Colombian germplasm. Colombia and northwestern South America generally have been cross-roads (Debouck et al 1993;Beebe et al 1997). An early study by identified S phaseolin along with the CH allele from the wild, and that cultivated genotypes in addition to having S, T and C phaseolin also had a the phaseolin allele B with the presence of this allele suggesting the possibility of additional domestication in this region ).…”
Section: Page 15 Of 34mentioning
confidence: 99%