2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-019-01242-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and biogeographic determinants of population structure in Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze

Abstract: Araucaria (Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze) is a primarily dioecious species threatened with extinction that plays an important social and economic role especially in the southern region of Brazil. The aim of this work is to investigate the diversity and likely determinants of genetic lineages in this species for conservation management. For this, a collection of 30-year-old Araucaria was used. Accessions collected from 12 sites across the species range were analyzed, with ten individuals per site. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SNP data gathered validate the ample applicability of the Axiom array and casts new light on the overall picture of diversity and structure of A. angustifolia along its extensive natural range. SNPs more accurately showed that southern populations ( H o =0.353) are significantly more genetically diverse that northern populations ( H o = 0.262) (Table 3), consistent with recent indications [31]. When compared to microsatellites, SNPs provided considerably lower estimates of heterozigosity and scant, if any, evidence of trivial inbreeding either positive or negative within-populations, and none at range wide level.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SNP data gathered validate the ample applicability of the Axiom array and casts new light on the overall picture of diversity and structure of A. angustifolia along its extensive natural range. SNPs more accurately showed that southern populations ( H o =0.353) are significantly more genetically diverse that northern populations ( H o = 0.262) (Table 3), consistent with recent indications [31]. When compared to microsatellites, SNPs provided considerably lower estimates of heterozigosity and scant, if any, evidence of trivial inbreeding either positive or negative within-populations, and none at range wide level.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3), and showing a considerably higher population differentiation due to regional than population within-region difference (Table 4). This genetic cline has been explained by the combined effect of post-glacial migration from different refugia [22, 81] and a north-south isolation most likely due to niche suitability [31]. The possibility of an additional phylogeographic separation of a third genetic group in the northern populations was also suggested earlier based on tenuous evidence from microsatellites [22] and recently confirmed based on sequence data of three intragenic regions in the chloroplast genome (cpDNA) [81].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of phylogenetic data, genetic diversity, and population structure analyses to characterize the biodiversity of wild species has been well-established in numerous studies (e.g. [35][36][37][38][39] ). Microsatellites (Single Sequence Repeats, SSR) are amongst the most efficient and widely used markers for these studies as they are codominant and highly polymorphic loci 40 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding population differentiation, isozymes, microsatellites and AFLPs provided equally low estimates as our microsatellite dataset. However, a recent study with 15 microsatellites showed a slightly higher estimate based on spatial AMOVA ( F ct = 0.187) [ 31 ], suggesting that if a larger number of microsatellites is used the estimates might eventually converge to those obtained with SNPs. Chloroplast DNA, as expected, provided significantly higher estimates of population differentiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isozymes allowed the first estimates of genetic diversity, structure and mating system [ 17 – 21 ]. Next, studies were carried out using dominant AFLP markers [ 22 24 ], or small sets of five to 15 microsatellites to compare the genetic diversity among natural and planted forest stands or estimate spatial genetic structure, mating system and gene flow [ 22 , 25 31 ]. The ultimate goal of these studies has been to provide evidence-based information for supporting conservation strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%