2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01433.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity among pearl millet maintainers using microsatellite markers

Abstract: Kapila, R. K., Yadav, R. S., Plaha, K. N., Rai, K. N., Yadav, O. P., Hash, C. T., Howarth, C. J. (2008). Genetic diversity among pearl millet maintainers using microsatellite markers. Plant Breeding, 127, (1), pp. 33-37 Sponsorship: DFID, BBSRC IMPF: 01.28 RONO: 1340 4212;1320 3012;1700 6445; 03130Genetic diversity among 70 maintainers and two pollinators of sub-Saharan and Indian origin was studied for simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci using 34 primer pairs. A total of 213 alleles were detected with an averag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
32
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
15
32
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This variation could have happened due to regional barriers, heterosis, and/or man made selection (Upadhyaya et al, 2008). Present research also exhibited a higher PIC (0.518) than that reported earlier in foxtail millet (0.381) and rice (0.42) (Jin et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2012), but lower than that reported in maize (0.72), pearl millet (0.58), persimmon (0.67) and perilla (0.59) (Pejic et al, 1998;Kapila et al, 2007;Seo et al, 2013;Song et al, 2012). Here, we have used a combination of di-and trinucleotides that might be the cause of variation, because a higher number of dinucleotide repeats instead of trinucleotides or higher numbers increase the genetic variability (Yang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…This variation could have happened due to regional barriers, heterosis, and/or man made selection (Upadhyaya et al, 2008). Present research also exhibited a higher PIC (0.518) than that reported earlier in foxtail millet (0.381) and rice (0.42) (Jin et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2012), but lower than that reported in maize (0.72), pearl millet (0.58), persimmon (0.67) and perilla (0.59) (Pejic et al, 1998;Kapila et al, 2007;Seo et al, 2013;Song et al, 2012). Here, we have used a combination of di-and trinucleotides that might be the cause of variation, because a higher number of dinucleotide repeats instead of trinucleotides or higher numbers increase the genetic variability (Yang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Such genetic differences in pearl millet have been studied previously by morphological and isozyme analysis (Tostain et al 1987;Tostain and Marchais, 1989;Tostain, 1992). Subsequently, RAPDs (Chowdari et al 1998), RFLPs (Bhattacharjee et al 2002), and SSRs (Budak et al 2003;Kapila et al 2008) and combinations of SSRs with other PCR-compatible markers (Thudi et al 2010) have been used to estimate pearl millet genetic diversity. The power of DArT fingerprinting method lies in its ability to compare different genomes at a large number of loci in a single assay, at an average cost per marker locus that is very low compared with PCR-compatible markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, Stich et al (2010) observed more number of alleles per locus, while analyzing diversity in germplasm lines. Similarly, Kapila et al (2008) found an average of 6.26 alleles per locus, in a set of maintainer lines. In this study, lower number of alleles per locus observed, could be explained that we have used agarose gel, which has lower resolution power in comparison to polyacrylamide gel used in these studies.…”
Section: Molecular Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%