2020
DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1805_73377351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity Among Durian (Durio Zibethinus Murr.) Populations From Nias Island, Indonesia Using Rapd Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of fragment polymorphic in this study was higher than previously reported by Sheet et al (2018) in mulberry cultivars (59.62%), Kumar et al (2019) in papaya (58.36%), and El-Khayat & Aseel (2020) in four Egyptian Mandarin cultivars (53.81%). The level of polymorphism obtained in the present study is lower than in those previous studies reported by Sundari et al (2017) in durian (86.50%), Hannum et al (2020) in durian (100%), Fadillah et al (2022) in Rukam (93.42%). However, the degree of polymorphism obtained in the present study is almost similar to that obtained in an earlier study using the RAPD marker on the citrus cultivar (80.63%) (Shahzadi et al 2016), Prunus salisina L (81.60%) (Li et al 2022).…”
Section: Genetic Variationcontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The percentage of fragment polymorphic in this study was higher than previously reported by Sheet et al (2018) in mulberry cultivars (59.62%), Kumar et al (2019) in papaya (58.36%), and El-Khayat & Aseel (2020) in four Egyptian Mandarin cultivars (53.81%). The level of polymorphism obtained in the present study is lower than in those previous studies reported by Sundari et al (2017) in durian (86.50%), Hannum et al (2020) in durian (100%), Fadillah et al (2022) in Rukam (93.42%). However, the degree of polymorphism obtained in the present study is almost similar to that obtained in an earlier study using the RAPD marker on the citrus cultivar (80.63%) (Shahzadi et al 2016), Prunus salisina L (81.60%) (Li et al 2022).…”
Section: Genetic Variationcontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…By leveraging this scientific breakthrough, the present study assessed the genetic base of durian plantations in Hainan, aiming to develop molecular markers for durian breeding efforts. Genetic research on durian has developed relatively slowly due to inadequate genetic information and effective molecular marker systems, with those reported so far based on morphological markers [17][18][19][20]. The present study used leaf samples of durian in the plantation sites in Hainan whose genetic base largely remain unknown, coupled with the same genotype names but differences in morphology, and vice versa (Table 1), to elucidate the genetic bases to ensure effective conservation and utilization in breeding programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, attempts were made to characterize durian germplasm and its relatives via morphological markers. However, this is inefficient due to multigenic interaction and is heavily affected by environmental factors [17][18][19][20]. Mursyidin, et al [21] characterized 18 exotic Durio spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplification was carried out in a SensoQuest thermocycler with a cycle programmed for 45 cycles of each of the following conditions: initial denaturation at a temperature of 94C for 2 minutes, followed by denaturation at 94C for 1 minute, annealing at 34C for 1 minute, elongation at 72C for 2 minutes 20 seconds, and the final condition was elongation at 72C for 10 minutes. OPA-02 TGCCGAGCTG [24] OPA-03 AGTCAGCCAC [25] OPA-07 GAAACGGGTG [25] OPA-08 GTGACGTAGG [26] OPA-10 GTGATCGCAG [25] OPA-13 CAGCACCCAC [25] OPA-16 AGCCAGCGAA [27] OPB-08 GTCCACACGG [28] OPB-10 CTGCTGGGAC [29] Electrophoresis…”
Section: Rapd Primer Selection and Dna Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%