2016
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.151170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic discrimination legislation in Canada: moving from rhetoric to real debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been criticized by some scholars for its limited scope, which often allows for discrimination based on medical information concerning familial history of disease (e.g., stroke) or risks that may be largely inherited (e.g., cholesterol level). In the context of insurance, for instance, some scholars object to the idea that differential treatment based on genetic test results should be prohibited, while the use of familial history of disease is acceptable to them (26,54,63,66). They assert that genetic and familial influences both are beyond individual control and can be predictive of individuals' future health.…”
Section: Emerging Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been criticized by some scholars for its limited scope, which often allows for discrimination based on medical information concerning familial history of disease (e.g., stroke) or risks that may be largely inherited (e.g., cholesterol level). In the context of insurance, for instance, some scholars object to the idea that differential treatment based on genetic test results should be prohibited, while the use of familial history of disease is acceptable to them (26,54,63,66). They assert that genetic and familial influences both are beyond individual control and can be predictive of individuals' future health.…”
Section: Emerging Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%