1997
DOI: 10.2307/3226976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Differentiation between Unionicola formosa and U. foili (Acari: Unionicolidae): Cryptic Species of Molluscan Symbionts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most species are obligate mussel symbionts, and use host tissues, including the gills (gill mites), or mantle and foot (mantle mites) as sites of oviposition (Vidrine 1996a). A taxonomic treatise of North American Unionicola mussel-mites (Vidrine 1996b), along with behavioral (LaRochelle and Dimock 1981; Edwards and Dimock 1995) and population genetic studies (Edwards and Dimock 1997;Edwards et al 1998) for a limited number of species of mussel-mites from North America suggests that the evolution of Unionicola mites is closely tied to the evolutionary history of their hosts. However, a thorough understanding of this interplay awaits well-supported phylogenies of both mussels and their Unionicola symbionts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most species are obligate mussel symbionts, and use host tissues, including the gills (gill mites), or mantle and foot (mantle mites) as sites of oviposition (Vidrine 1996a). A taxonomic treatise of North American Unionicola mussel-mites (Vidrine 1996b), along with behavioral (LaRochelle and Dimock 1981; Edwards and Dimock 1995) and population genetic studies (Edwards and Dimock 1997;Edwards et al 1998) for a limited number of species of mussel-mites from North America suggests that the evolution of Unionicola mites is closely tied to the evolutionary history of their hosts. However, a thorough understanding of this interplay awaits well-supported phylogenies of both mussels and their Unionicola symbionts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic findings of Edwards and Dimock (1997) resulted in the designation of a new species within the subgenus Uriioiiicola, U. foili Edwards and Vidrine, 1994. There are 5 known species of Uiiioriicola from the subgenus Diriiockatar Vidrine, 1992, four of which occur in North America in association with anodontine bivalve molluscs (Vidrine, 1986b). Morphological differences among species from this subgenus are minor and based primarily on the number and relative size of clawlets on the palpal tarsus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interestingly, an examination of allozyme variation (Edwards and Dimock, 1997) and heterogeneity in the sequence data of the mitochondria1 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (~0 .~1 ) gene (Emsting et nl.,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing evolutionary relationships among species of Unionicola within subgenera using morphological criteria may prove to be problematical for at least two reasons. First, morphological differences among species that comprise subgenera are often comparatively minor, making it rather difficult to delineate species on the basis of morphological characters (Vidrine, 1996b;Edwards and Dimock, 1997). Second, there have been suggestions that morphological characters that have been used to distinguish between certain species of Unionieola (e.g., species from the subgenus Unionicolides Lundblad 1937) are plastic and influenced by the host species in which these Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%