Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10182-010-0021-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Differentiation Among Geographically Close Populations of Malva Alcea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that, the geographical origin of accessions has no influence on the clusters obtained. Such results were also obtained in a number of studies and explained that the accessions from different regions might have similar genetic background and those from the same origin might also have different genetic background (KENENI et al, 2005;GASHAW et al, 2007;CELKA et al, 2010;SHARIFOVA et al, 2013). All those results suggested that selection of parent genotypes based on geographical origin only was not an accurate indicator of genetic diversity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This indicates that, the geographical origin of accessions has no influence on the clusters obtained. Such results were also obtained in a number of studies and explained that the accessions from different regions might have similar genetic background and those from the same origin might also have different genetic background (KENENI et al, 2005;GASHAW et al, 2007;CELKA et al, 2010;SHARIFOVA et al, 2013). All those results suggested that selection of parent genotypes based on geographical origin only was not an accurate indicator of genetic diversity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Although accessions with the same or adjacent geographic origin have the tendency to cluster together, accessions from different regions were also found to be closely related regardless of their geographic origin. This suggests that selection of parent genotypes for breeding should not be based on geographical origin only because this is not always an accurate indicator of genetic diversity (Keneni et al 2005;Zvingila et al 2005;Gashaw et al 2007;Celka et al 2010). The tendency of grouping genotypes with different geographical origins into the same cluster did not allow us also to make an assumption about the geographical origin of AG-1222, AG-1223, and AG-1224 genotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malva plants, primarily M. sylvestris , also M. moschata L., M. neglecta , M. alcea L., and M. rotundifolia, are widely recognized for food and medicinal purposes (Celka, Buczkowska, Baczkiewicz, & Drapikowska, ; Gasparetto, Martins, Hayashi, Otuky, & Pontarolo, ). Commonly, these are ornamental plants, although they may be used as a food resource and remedy for various diseases (Al‐Rubaye et al, ).…”
Section: Folk Medicinal Uses Of Malva Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malva plants, primarily M. sylvestris, also M. moschata L., M. neglecta, M. alcea L., and M. rotundifolia, are widely recognized for food and medicinal purposes (Celka, Buczkowska, Baczkiewicz, & Drapikowska, 2010;Gasparetto, Martins, Hayashi, Otuky, & Pontarolo, 2012 (Table 3).…”
Section: Folk Medicinal Uses Of Malva Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%