2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diagnosis of Down syndrome in an underserved community

Abstract: It is a matter of course that in high-income countries, infants born with features suggestive of Down syndrome (DS) are offered genetic testing for confirmation of a clinical diagnosis. Benefits of a definitive diagnosis include an end to the diagnostic odyssey, informed prognosis, opportunities for caregiver support, inclusion to social support networks, and more meaningful genetic counseling. The healthcare experience for families of children born with DS in low- and middle-income nations is in stark contras… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic centres offer a family orientation on health care and appropriate guidance by varied health professionals to help them assess differential needs of individuals with DS (Sobering et al . 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic centres offer a family orientation on health care and appropriate guidance by varied health professionals to help them assess differential needs of individuals with DS (Sobering et al . 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual 4 was a 5-year-old female who first came to our atten- (Charles et al, 2017), 2 (Yearwood et al, 2018), 3 (Mitchell et al, 2019), 4, (Kruszka et al, 2017), 5 (Sobering et al, 2017).…”
Section: Individualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in collaboration with local clinicians and medical students as extracurricular academic activities. 6,7 The informal process leading to the diagnosis was initiated when the proband sought medical attention from her primary care physician, who was aware of the research interests of the senior author.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%