2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.112222099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic determination of the queen caste in an ant hybrid zone

Abstract: The question of how reproductives and sterile workers differentiate within eusocial groups has long been a core issue in sociobiology because it requires the loss of individual direct fitness in favor of indirect or group-level fitness gains. The evolution of social behavior requires that differentiation between workers and female reproductives be environmentally determined, because genetically determined sterility would be quickly eliminated. Nevertheless, we report clear evidence of genetic caste determinati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
171
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(20 reference statements)
3
171
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, genotypic variability does not appear as a necessary condition for intracolonial diversity and task specialization in C. cursor. This contrasts with the several cases where genetic variability among workers has been shown to influence division of labour in insect societies (honeybee: Frumhoff & Baker 1988;Robinson & Page 1988;Fuchs & Schade 1994;Page et al 1995;Kryger et al 2000;termites: Goodisman & Crozier 2003;ants: Stuart & Page 1991;Snyder 1992;Blatrix et al 2000;Julian et al 2002;Bargum et al 2004;Schwander et al 2005). The lack of genetic polyethism in C. cursor also suggests that within-colony genetic diversity is not associated with increased task efficiency and/or colony performance in this species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, genotypic variability does not appear as a necessary condition for intracolonial diversity and task specialization in C. cursor. This contrasts with the several cases where genetic variability among workers has been shown to influence division of labour in insect societies (honeybee: Frumhoff & Baker 1988;Robinson & Page 1988;Fuchs & Schade 1994;Page et al 1995;Kryger et al 2000;termites: Goodisman & Crozier 2003;ants: Stuart & Page 1991;Snyder 1992;Blatrix et al 2000;Julian et al 2002;Bargum et al 2004;Schwander et al 2005). The lack of genetic polyethism in C. cursor also suggests that within-colony genetic diversity is not associated with increased task efficiency and/or colony performance in this species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…For instance, workers belonging to certain patrilines show a higher tendency to perform certain tasks such as foraging, recruiting, guarding, stinging, or nest-cleaning in the honeybee (Frumhoff & Baker 1988;Robinson & Page 1988, 1989Page et al 1989Page et al , 1995Oldroyd et al 1994), wasps (O'Donnell 1998), and in a few ant species (Stuart & Page 1991;Hughes et al 2003). Similarly, a significant genetic component to division of labour has been reported in ant colonies headed by multiple queens (polygyny), with workers belonging to different matrilines showing a different propensity to perform distinct tasks (Snyder 1992;Blatrix et al 2000;Julian et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hung & Vinson 1977;Ross et al 1987;Vander Meer & Lofgren 1989;Helms Cahan & Vinson 2003;Shoemaker et al 2006) and several other ant genera (Lasius : Pearson 1983b, Seifert 1999, Umphrey 2006Formica: Seifert 1999, Seifert & Goropashnaya 2004Temnothorax: Douwes & Stille 1991, Seifert 1999, Pusch et al 2006aPogonomyrmex: Helms Cahan et al 2002, Julian et al 2002, Schwander et al 2007bCrematogaster: Feldhaar et al 2003, H. Feldhaar 2006. It appears that in some areas of Central Europe, almost half of all female sexuals of the well-studied and highly diverse ant genus Temnothorax mate with allospecific males (Douwes & Stille 1991;Seifert 1999).…”
Section: Seemingly Indiscriminate Mating and The Commonness Of Hybridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lineages are reproductively isolated from the pure parental species and obligately hybridize. Sterile workers are produced from interlineage zygotes, while female sexuals are raised from eggs fertilized by sperm from the same lineage (Helms Cahan et al 2002Julian et al 2002;Volny & Gordon 2002;Helms Cahan & Keller 2003;Anderson et al 2006), resulting in a reproductive division of labour between hybrid workers and purelineage female sexual. This mechanism of caste determination appears to be genetically fixed, as (2006a,b) a Hybridization between the respective species was detected with: A, allozyme data; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; nDNA, nuclear DNA including microsatellite data; M, morphological data.…”
Section: Individual-and Species-level Consequences Of Hybridization Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GCD colonies, gynes are consistently homozygous at diagnostic loci whereas workers are heterozygous at the same loci (12,16,17). This genetic colony structure occurs because founding queens mate with males of two distinct and reproductively isolated lineages, producing heterozygous workers from alternate-lineage matings and homozygous gynes from same-lineage matings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%