1991
DOI: 10.1080/03014469100001382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic demography of the Moscow population: migration, outbreeding and assortative mating

Abstract: Using marriage records, census data, and other statistical sources, some demographic parameters of Moscow population in 1955 and 1980 have been studied, such as age at marriage, birthplace, nationality and profession of permanent residents. Migration has been shown to be the main factor of Moscow population dynamics. Genetically significant, quantitative and geographic parameters of this process have been obtained (migration rates, migration and marital distances, proportion of interethnic marriages). During t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study indicate clear evidence of similarity between mates in educational level and occupation, which are usually used as social indicators. Thus, the findings are consistent with previous results suggesting social homogamy for education (Garrison, Anderson & Reed, 1968;Kiser, 1968;Johnson et al, 1976;Mascie-Taylor, 1987) and also for occupations of spouses (Mascie-Taylor, 1987;Kurbatova & Pobedonostseva, 1991) and occupation of husband and fatherin-law (Van Scharen & Susanne, 1974). One of the few studies performed on Spanish populations has also shown some degree of socioeconomic affinity between husband and wife (Sanchez-Laulhe, Sandin & Ugalde, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results of the present study indicate clear evidence of similarity between mates in educational level and occupation, which are usually used as social indicators. Thus, the findings are consistent with previous results suggesting social homogamy for education (Garrison, Anderson & Reed, 1968;Kiser, 1968;Johnson et al, 1976;Mascie-Taylor, 1987) and also for occupations of spouses (Mascie-Taylor, 1987;Kurbatova & Pobedonostseva, 1991) and occupation of husband and fatherin-law (Van Scharen & Susanne, 1974). One of the few studies performed on Spanish populations has also shown some degree of socioeconomic affinity between husband and wife (Sanchez-Laulhe, Sandin & Ugalde, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The radius of the Belgorod population calculated using Malecot's isolation by distance model (Table 10) was unusually large, being comparable with the radius of the Moscow population [9], which may have been determined by the large number of short-range migrants. The effective migration parameter was lower than general migration coefficients by several times.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of Malecot's isolation by distance model were determined. We also calculated the indices of marriage convergence ( K ) and relative assortative marriage ( A ') with respect to birthplace, some general statistics, and the values of the χ 2 , t , and F tests [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined Fisher test for p-values from Fisher's exact tests showed insignificant difference between the Belarusian and Russian populations ( p = 0.23). We explain this insignificance as that the Moscow population of ethnic Russians perhaps is a genetic mixture from various regions of Russia and the neighboring countries due to migration from into the city during the last century [15]. Therefore, our data on the Moscowian Russians is a sort of a combined sample from around Eastern Europe and even beyond that.…”
Section: Belarus' Str Databasementioning
confidence: 88%