2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41454-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic data improve the assessment of the conservation status based only on herbarium records of a Neotropical tree

Abstract: Although there is a consensus among conservation biologists about the importance of genetic information, the assessment of extinction risk and conservation decision-making generally do not explicitly consider this type of data. Genetic data can be even more important in species where little other information is available. In this study, we investigated a poorly known legume tree, Dimorphandra exaltata , from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, a hotspot for conservation. We coupled species di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This new evidence could offer a robust and reliable resolution of the evolutionary history and taxonomic status of species, resulting in the re-evaluation of previous conservation strategies or the establishment of new conservation programs in order to better protect and manage biodiversity. Information used to decide if a species is at risk of extinction and its threat category are usually based on ecological and demographic data such as the number of known individuals, current or projected declines in population size and the extent of occurrence or distribution (IUCN, 2014;Carneiro Muniz et al, 2019). However, for rare species where little additional information is available, genetic data is extremely important (Carneiro Muniz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This new evidence could offer a robust and reliable resolution of the evolutionary history and taxonomic status of species, resulting in the re-evaluation of previous conservation strategies or the establishment of new conservation programs in order to better protect and manage biodiversity. Information used to decide if a species is at risk of extinction and its threat category are usually based on ecological and demographic data such as the number of known individuals, current or projected declines in population size and the extent of occurrence or distribution (IUCN, 2014;Carneiro Muniz et al, 2019). However, for rare species where little additional information is available, genetic data is extremely important (Carneiro Muniz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information used to decide if a species is at risk of extinction and its threat category are usually based on ecological and demographic data such as the number of known individuals, current or projected declines in population size and the extent of occurrence or distribution (IUCN, 2014;Carneiro Muniz et al, 2019). However, for rare species where little additional information is available, genetic data is extremely important (Carneiro Muniz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we propose to use GA measures for performing clustering analyses (CAs) and automatically identifying contaminants in forage grass biparental populations, grouping individuals based on GA similarity measures instead of their raw SNP data. Although CA of large SNP datasets has been extensively used to discover patterns in population relatedness and structure (Gori et al, 2016;Muniz et al, 2019;Yousefi-Mashouf et al, 2021), its use for parentage assignment is not common because of the nonspecificity and constancy of the clusters, but has already been combined with previously described techniques for parentage and sibship inference in diploids (Ellis et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we propose to use GA measures for performing clustering analyses (CAs) and automatically identifying contaminants in forage grass biparental populations, grouping individuals based on GA similarity measures instead of their raw SNP data. Although CA of large SNP datasets has been extensively used to discover patterns in population relatedness and structure (Gori et al, 2016;Muniz et al, 2019;Yousefi-Mashouf et al, 2021), its use for parentage assignment is not common because of the clusters' nonspecificity and constancy, but has already been combined with previously described techniques for parentage and sibship inference in diploids (Ellis et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%