2005
DOI: 10.4103/0971-6866.16810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic damage in mobile phone users: some preliminary findings

Abstract: BACKGROUND :The impact of microwave (MW)/radio frequency radiation (RFR) on important biological parameters is probably more than a simply thermal one. Exposure to radio frequency (RF) signals generated by the use of cellular telephones have increased dramatically and reported to affect physiological, neurological, cognitive and behavioural changes and to induce, initiate and promote carcinogenesis. Genotoxicity of RFR has also been reported in various test systems after in vitro and/or in vivo exposure but no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, DNA migration length values in control males (18.9 6 1.79 lm) and in control females (23.4 6 3.94 lm) were lower than the values reported for other Indian studies [Jaiswal et al, 1994;Desai et al, 1998;Bajpayee et al, 2002]. The differences reported in literature in control individuals (pooled data) may be because of differences in gender [Bajpayee et al, 2002;Lam et al, 2002], age of the individual [Piperakis et al, 1998] or from confounding factors like differences in diet [Dhawan et al, 2001] and life styles e.g., mobile phone usage; [Gandhi and Anita, 2005]. Furthermore, the alkali unwinding time and time of electrophoretic run can also affect the extent of DNA migration [Singh et al, 1994;Faust et al, 2004].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, DNA migration length values in control males (18.9 6 1.79 lm) and in control females (23.4 6 3.94 lm) were lower than the values reported for other Indian studies [Jaiswal et al, 1994;Desai et al, 1998;Bajpayee et al, 2002]. The differences reported in literature in control individuals (pooled data) may be because of differences in gender [Bajpayee et al, 2002;Lam et al, 2002], age of the individual [Piperakis et al, 1998] or from confounding factors like differences in diet [Dhawan et al, 2001] and life styles e.g., mobile phone usage; [Gandhi and Anita, 2005]. Furthermore, the alkali unwinding time and time of electrophoretic run can also affect the extent of DNA migration [Singh et al, 1994;Faust et al, 2004].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Age-dependent increase in levels of DNA damage in normal males [Piperakis et al, 1998], higher levels of DNA damage in non-vegetarians as compared with vegetarians [Dhawan et al, 2001] and a significant association between alcohol consumption and DNA damage have been reported. Levels of DNA damage in mobile phone users have also been studied [Gandhi and Anita, 2005]. In Table XIII, the data for DNA migration length and the ranges observed are presented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Lai and Singh demonstrated increases in DNA strand breaks in rats brain cells exposed to a 2450 MHz RF for 2 h (SAR between 0.6 and 1.2 W/kg) Singh, 1997, 2005). In addition, it has been revealed increases in DNA strand breaks in lymphocytes obtained from cell phone consumers (Gandhi and Anita, 2005). Franzellitti et al suggested RF radiation via modulation scheme and a carrier frequency typical of the GSM signal might have an effect on DNA structure (Franzellitti et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies observed significant increases in dicentric chromosomes (among smoker-alcoholic mobile users), sister chromatid exchanges (synergistic action with mitomycin C) [6], micro-nucleation and DNA strand breaks [7] in blood lymphocytes obtained from mobile phone users. A significant increase in erythrocyte micronuclei frequency was observed in newborn pups of mother rats maintained under 834 MHz EMF exposure at a SAR of 1.23 W/kg for 8.5 h per day throughout the gestation period [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%