2013
DOI: 10.12705/623.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic, cytological and morphological differentiation within the Balkan‐CarpathianSesleria rigidasensu Fl. Eur. (Poaceae): A taxonomically intricate tetraploid‐octoploid complex

Abstract: Reconstruction of relationships among populations of the morphologically polymorphic and taxonomically intricate Sesleria rigida sensu Fl. Eur. based on Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs) revealed four clearly differentiated genetic groups that did only partly follow recent taxonomic concepts, but were strictly allopatric. While some of the previously described taxa constitute distinct genetic entities, others have no taxonomic value. Synthesizing our AFLP data with ploidy‐level information obtain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…data on C. orbelica). A more intricate situation was found, e.g., in the Sesleria rigida complex (calciphilous grasses with a wide altitudinal range), where a Carpathian lineage has been segregated as the separate taxon S. rigida, allopatric but closely related to a neighbouring Balkan lineage, which in turn included isolated populations from the Romanian Carpathians (Kuzmanović & al., 2013). Such a lineage distribution may reflect several processes of isolation and expansion through barriers, acting at the biogeographical border area, probably at different times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…data on C. orbelica). A more intricate situation was found, e.g., in the Sesleria rigida complex (calciphilous grasses with a wide altitudinal range), where a Carpathian lineage has been segregated as the separate taxon S. rigida, allopatric but closely related to a neighbouring Balkan lineage, which in turn included isolated populations from the Romanian Carpathians (Kuzmanović & al., 2013). Such a lineage distribution may reflect several processes of isolation and expansion through barriers, acting at the biogeographical border area, probably at different times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the relationships between closely related Central European and Balkan taxa and species treated as regional endemics are often insufficiently studied, which hampers discussing specific aspects of biodiversity, taxonomy and biogeography of the Balkan and Central European mountain flora. A need for comprehensive revision of regional taxonomic entities, detailed investigation of their morphological and genetic variation including the potential presence of cryptic taxa, and the biogeographical significance of regional lineages, has been increasingly demonstrated (e.g., Perný & al., 2004;Lakušić & al., 2006Albach & al., 2009;Schönswetter & Schneeweiss, 2009;Surina & al., 2009;Bardy & al., 2010;Kučera & al., 2010;Kuzmanović & al., 2013). Regarding sparse data on regional intraspecific differentiation patterns of the high-mountain flora and its role as a potential stock of genetic resources for more northerly areas, large-scale phylogeographical studies on alpine species highlighted the Pleistocene isolation between the Balkan and the Alpine populations (Albach & al., 2006) or the existence of major, internally diversified eastern clades in the European mountains, comprising the Balkan Peninsula and the Carpathians (Frajman & Oxelman, 2007;Puşcaş & al., 2008; see also Ronikier, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AFLP technique generates a high number of biparentally inherited markers capturing genome polymorphisms, and despite some limitations (e.g., potential fragment size homoplasy, dominant and anonymous nature of markers, their potential non-independence, low information content), it has proven informative in evolutionary and phylogenetic inferences among closely related congeners (Meudt & Clarke, 2007;García-Pereira & al., 2010). Its efficiency has also been demonstrated in several polyploid complexes (e.g., Balao & al., 2010;Bardy & al., 2010;Bendiksby & al., 2011;Rebernig & al., 2012;Greiner & al., 2013;Kuzmanović & al., 2013) that posed great taxonomic and evolutionary challenges. Highly variable intergenic spacers of maternally inherited, non-recombinant cpDNA have also been useful to determine relationships and evolution of closely related species (e.g., Borsch & Quandt, 2009;Consaul & al., 2010;.…”
Section: Taxonomy and Evolutionary History Of Alyssum Montanum (Brassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…;Valdés & Scholz, 2009: 32 spp.). Several species have been described recently (e.g., S. rhodopaea Tashev & D.Dimitrov;Tashev & Dimitrov, 2012) and so far the status of only a few taxa was clarified using molecular phylogenies (e.g., Kuzmanović & al., 2013a). The genus is distributed from Spain in the west to the Caucasus and Iran in the east, and from Iceland and Scandinavia in the north to Libya and Lebanon Phylogenetic relationships in Seslerieae (Poaceae) including resurrection of Psilathera and Sesleriella, two monotypic genera endemic to the Alps and Echinaria Desf., classified in tribe Seslerieae (Quintanar & al., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a number of contributions carried out from the late 1930s onwards (Ujhelyi, 1938(Ujhelyi, , 1940(Ujhelyi, , 1959a(Ujhelyi, , b, 1960(Ujhelyi, , 1965Deyl, 1946;Ujhelyi & Felföldy, 1948;Strgar, 1966Strgar, , 1968Strgar, , 1973Strgar, , 1979Strgar, , 1980Strgar, , 1981Strgar, , 1982Strgar, , 1985Strgar, , 1988Strgar, , 1990Lysák & al., 1997Lysák & al., , 2000Lysák & Doležel, 1998;Foggi & al., 2001Foggi & al., , 2007Reisch & al., 2003;Di Pietro & al., 2005;Alegro, 2007;Di Pietro, 2007;Kuzmanović & al., 2013aKuzmanović & al., , b, 2015Budžakova & al., 2014), a comprehensive phylogenetic study of Sesleria is still missing. Some recent studies have focused on groups of allegedly closely related species (Di Pietro & al., 2005;Alegro, 2007;Kuzmanović & al., 2013a;Budžakova & al., 2014) or on nomenclatural issues (Di Pietro & al., 2013;. Others have explored genome size variation and patterns of polyploidisation within Sesleria (Lazarević & al., 2015;Kuzmanović & Schönswetter, 2016), but overall taxonomy and relationships among different species groups remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%