2008
DOI: 10.12702/1984-7033.v08n04a04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic control of the number of days to flowering in common bean

Abstract: -The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic control of early flowering in common bean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strongly associated traits are usually under the influence of the same gene or genes located close together on the chromosome and can both be selected simultaneously (Lobo, 2008). Days to flowering have been reported to be under the control of dominance and additive gene effect with the dominance effect being lower, and when present it reduces the number of days to flowering (Mendes et al, 2008). A similar correlation result (0.7) between days to flowering and days to maturity was reported in a previous study conducted by Kamfwa et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Strongly associated traits are usually under the influence of the same gene or genes located close together on the chromosome and can both be selected simultaneously (Lobo, 2008). Days to flowering have been reported to be under the control of dominance and additive gene effect with the dominance effect being lower, and when present it reduces the number of days to flowering (Mendes et al, 2008). A similar correlation result (0.7) between days to flowering and days to maturity was reported in a previous study conducted by Kamfwa et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Yet, there are no reports on the length of NDPM for these parents. There is information in the literature concerning the genetic control of NDF (Oliveira et al, 1996;Mendes et al, 2008). Overall, research indicates that there is a predominance of the additive effect, as observed in this study ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Since QU-GENE simulates error variances based on the per plant broad-sense heritability, it was necessary to calculate these values based on the per plot heritability estimates reported in the literature (Atuahene-Amankwa et al 2004 ; Carneiro et al 2011 ; Carvalho et al 2013 ; Kolkman and Kelly 2002 ; Mendes et al 2008 ; Miklas et al 2001 ; Nienhuis and Singh 1988 ; Singh et al 1990 ; White and Singh 1991 ). While QU-GENE uses broad-sense heritability, narrow-sense heritability estimates were provided to QU-GENE, as only additive effects were considered among the QTL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%