2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.538226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Constraints, Transcriptome Plasticity, and the Evolutionary Response to Climate Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
55
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(97 reference statements)
8
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evolutionary change in trait means is better understood and does provide evidence for local adaptation (e.g., Hoffmann et al, 2002;Kellermann et al, 2012). However, upper thermal limits seem to be evolutionary constrained in some small ectothermic insects (particularly studied in Drosophila) (Kellermann et al, 2012;Schou et al, 2014; but see discussion in Logan and Cox, 2020), while not in some species of phytoplankton (Kontopoulos et al, 2020). The constraint among species of Drosophila is not founded in an apparent lack of additive genetic variation, as significant levels of genetic variation for heat tolerance in the same species of Drosophila have been documented (Williams et al, 2012;Castaneda et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary change in trait means is better understood and does provide evidence for local adaptation (e.g., Hoffmann et al, 2002;Kellermann et al, 2012). However, upper thermal limits seem to be evolutionary constrained in some small ectothermic insects (particularly studied in Drosophila) (Kellermann et al, 2012;Schou et al, 2014; but see discussion in Logan and Cox, 2020), while not in some species of phytoplankton (Kontopoulos et al, 2020). The constraint among species of Drosophila is not founded in an apparent lack of additive genetic variation, as significant levels of genetic variation for heat tolerance in the same species of Drosophila have been documented (Williams et al, 2012;Castaneda et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, tropical forests may buffer changes in temperature to some extent, reducing the magnitude of change experienced by slender anoles relative to brown anoles (De Frenne et al, 2019). Our analyses also ignore other variables that are likely to change as a result of climate change, including precipitation, cloud cover, wind dynamics, and the frequency of extreme weather events (Bonebrake & Deutsch, 2012; Bonebrake & Mastrandrea, 2010; Campbell‐Staton et al, 2017; Clusella‐Trullas et al, 2011; Grant et al, 2017; Logan & Cox, 2020). Finally, although we used an integrative, data‐rich approach, our study consisted of a comparison of only two species, and as such, our results should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal adaptation is a complex polygenic trait well-described in terms of its genetic architecture and selection footprints across a wide range of phylogenetically diverse taxa (Way and Oren, 2010;Valladares et al, 2014;López-Hernández and Cortés, 2019). While genomics has enabled these achievements that rely on past events of thermal variation, forward predictions remain one step behind partly because (1) disentangling selective and demographic drivers of the genomic landscape from fortuitous genomic constrains (Logan and Cox, 2020) is puzzling (Ellegren and Galtier, 2016) and (2) merging these heterogeneous signatures and data sources into a cohesive predictive framework was unfeasible, until recently. In this mini-review, we advocated for novel approaches that may enhance our understanding of the genetic consequences of past climate change, while offering new avenues to calibrate more accurate predictive models of the thermal adaptive potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%