2008
DOI: 10.2989/ajms.2008.30.3.4.638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic characterisation of oyster populations along the north-eastern coast of Tunisia

Abstract: The taxonomy of oysters has been traditionally based on characteristics of the shell. More recently, the analysis of protein and DNA polymorphism has provided a means to overcome difficulties in distinguishing the different species of oysters based solely on shell morphology. In order to identify oysters of the Tunisian northeast coast, we sequenced a 16S rRNA mitochondrial fragment from 68 oysters sampled from the Bizert Lagoon and the Gulf of Hammamet in northern Tunisia. Comparison of oyster 16S rRNA sequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a detailed taxonomical examination is needed for its accurate identification, they exhibit notable genetic differences (Lapegue et al 2006), also confirmed from the phylogenetic trees (Figure 1). In other studies some O. stentina specimens could not be distinguished from C. gigas based on external shell morphology alone (Dridi et al 2008). Therefore, the presence of O. stentina in our study area could most likely remain undetected without the use of genetic markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Although a detailed taxonomical examination is needed for its accurate identification, they exhibit notable genetic differences (Lapegue et al 2006), also confirmed from the phylogenetic trees (Figure 1). In other studies some O. stentina specimens could not be distinguished from C. gigas based on external shell morphology alone (Dridi et al 2008). Therefore, the presence of O. stentina in our study area could most likely remain undetected without the use of genetic markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%