2011
DOI: 10.5897/ajb11.2291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic basis of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter clinical isolates in Saudi Arabia

Abstract: Carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinases are reported increasingly in Acinetobacter baumannii. Here we report the contribution of carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinases genes to carbapenem resistance in clinical Acinetobacter baumannii strains in Saudi Arabia. Forty non-repetitive clinical A. baumannii strains were isolated and identified from 40 patients, hospitalized in various wards in King Khalid University and Armed Forces Hospitals (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). Antibiotic susceptibility testing indicated that most i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, our results were nearly confirmed by Gao et al [28] who confirmed that (100%) of the carbapenem resistant isolates showed positive results for the presence of OXA 51 gene, (94%) for OXA 23, and the other two resistance genes (OXA 24 and OXA 58) were not detected in any of the strains. Same results were revealed by Rolain et al [29] in Hamad hospital in Qatar, that conveyed that (100%) of A. baumannii isolates were positive for OXA-23; none were positive for OXA-24, OXA-58 [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Also, our results were nearly confirmed by Gao et al [28] who confirmed that (100%) of the carbapenem resistant isolates showed positive results for the presence of OXA 51 gene, (94%) for OXA 23, and the other two resistance genes (OXA 24 and OXA 58) were not detected in any of the strains. Same results were revealed by Rolain et al [29] in Hamad hospital in Qatar, that conveyed that (100%) of A. baumannii isolates were positive for OXA-23; none were positive for OXA-24, OXA-58 [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%