2015
DOI: 10.1670/14-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Assessment of Taxonomic Uncertainty in Painted Turtles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…data). This range encompasses three subspecies, C. p. bellii, C. p. marginata and C. p. picta, that are not genetically distinct (Jensen, Govindarajulu, & Russello, 2015; Figure 2). Like most turtles, C. picta have TSD type Ia (Janzen & Paukstis, 1991), the system in which only male hatchlings are produced at relatively cool temperatures and females at warm temperatures.…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data). This range encompasses three subspecies, C. p. bellii, C. p. marginata and C. p. picta, that are not genetically distinct (Jensen, Govindarajulu, & Russello, 2015; Figure 2). Like most turtles, C. picta have TSD type Ia (Janzen & Paukstis, 1991), the system in which only male hatchlings are produced at relatively cool temperatures and females at warm temperatures.…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional taxonomy has recognized one species (Chrysemys picta) subdivided into four subspecies (Ernst and Lovich 2009). More recent phylogeographic research (Starkey et al 2003;Jensen et al 2015) has identified the southern subspecies as a monophyletic group, resulting in the elevation of this taxon to species status as C. dorsalis (TTWG (Turtle Taxonomy Working Group) et al 2017). We focus on the three northern subspecies of C. picta, and refer to these throughout as picta, marginata, and bellii ( Fig.…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three subspecies display considerable genetic variability, including multiple mitochondrial clades exhibiting spatial structure across the range. However, past research using phylogenetic methods has been unable to come to a clear consensus regarding the historical processes that have generated this variability, as there is a lack of strict monophyly among morphologically defined subspecies (Starkey et al 2003;Jensen et al 2015; Figure S1).…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four subspecies of painted turtle are recognized (Ernst and Lovich 2009), but the genus is undergoing taxonomic revision due to recent genetic work that potentially elevates Chrysemys picta dorsalis to species status [as C. dorsalis (Crother 2012;Jensen et al 2014a)]. For convenience in this paper, we refer to subspecies, but we acknowledge the unresolved taxonomy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%