2015
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Approaches to Facilitate Antibacterial Drug Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of whole‐cell screenings based on bacterial biosensors sensitized to inhibitors of specific targets represents a novel strategy to identify new antibacterial drugs (Hughes and Karlen, 2014; Schnappinger, 2015). As DprE1 has been shown to be a valid and vulnerable target for M. tuberculosis (Makarov et al ., 2009), we decided to use our set of promoters to develop an assay to identify molecules able to inhibit its activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of whole‐cell screenings based on bacterial biosensors sensitized to inhibitors of specific targets represents a novel strategy to identify new antibacterial drugs (Hughes and Karlen, 2014; Schnappinger, 2015). As DprE1 has been shown to be a valid and vulnerable target for M. tuberculosis (Makarov et al ., 2009), we decided to use our set of promoters to develop an assay to identify molecules able to inhibit its activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tighty regulated gene expression systems are powerful tools widely used to study essential genes, validate drug targets and evaluate their vulnerability (Schnappinger, 2015). In recent years, several such systems were developed for mycobacteria [reviewed in (Schnappinger and Ehrt, 2014;Choudhary et al, 2016)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must refrain from projecting the biology deciphered in one persistence model to other persistence models, for fear that we oversimplify phenotypic tolerance, much as Jacques Monod oversimplified biochemical unity when he declared, “ anything found to be true of E. coli must also be true of elephants ” (290). We need to focus time and resources on developing antibiotics that target mycobacteria in in vitro states that have relevance to persisters found during human tuberculosis, whose structures are accurately understood under the conditions of the assays, that exert bona fide bactericidal activity against nonreplicating mycobacteria, and that have a structure-activity relationship which enables at least one of its derivative compounds to make it through the gauntlet of drug development, or at least, to become an informative tool for chemical biology to guide our understanding of bacterial persistence (291, 292). …”
Section: Future Studies and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional biochemical methods for example, focus on primary compound-target interaction and use of binding affinity as a surrogate of target identification that, while specific, is not always functional or sufficiently sensitive to yield a specific target. In contrast, transcriptome-based approaches, while biologically broader in scope, report on the response, rather than direct impact, of a given compound, and thus make it hard to identify targets beyond the pathway level, or in comparison to a compendium of previously characterized reference compounds [52]. Whole genome sequencing of drug-resistant clones, though uniquely powerful for their organism-wide scope, is similarly associated with complex isolation procedures and the not infrequent discovery of secondary resistance genes involved in drug-activation, drug efflux and associated DNA transcription, while missing the primary target [5355].…”
Section: Compound-based Drug Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to serving as a specific lens into metabolic drug targets, metabolomics has also enabled biologically unbiased classification of compound MOAs in a way similar to what was achieved with genome-wide RNA profiling [52,6062]. This application makes specific use of the biological discriminatory power, rather than biological information, of metabolomic profiles as a means of classifying experimental compounds in relation to a compendium of reference profiles of known MOA (Figure 2B) [63].…”
Section: Compound-based Drug Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%