2019
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2019.05.0288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and Physiological Aspects of Drought Tolerance in Smooth Bromegrass

Abstract: The genetic basis of physiological traits and their association with forage yield and drought tolerance is poorly understood in smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss). In this study, half‐sib families from a polycross population were evaluated in the field under normal and water deficit conditions during 2012 and 2013. Water deficit greatly influenced physiological traits and forage production. Under water deficit conditions, most of physiological traits decreased, whereas carotenoid content, proline content… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water deficit caused a significant reduction in all of the measured traits except for DPE and DA in five years of study. As water deficit was applied each year from 1 May onwards, which coincided exactly with the start of flowering and just before pollination, these results were expected and are consistent with the findings of previous studies in orchardgrass (Saeidnia et al 2017;Majidi et al 2016) and smooth bromegrass (Abtahi et al 2019;Saeidnia et al 2020). The region in which the study was conducted (Najafabad, Isfahan, Iran) is a warm and dry area where the summer temperature reaches as high as 45°C and precipitation is null.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Water deficit caused a significant reduction in all of the measured traits except for DPE and DA in five years of study. As water deficit was applied each year from 1 May onwards, which coincided exactly with the start of flowering and just before pollination, these results were expected and are consistent with the findings of previous studies in orchardgrass (Saeidnia et al 2017;Majidi et al 2016) and smooth bromegrass (Abtahi et al 2019;Saeidnia et al 2020). The region in which the study was conducted (Najafabad, Isfahan, Iran) is a warm and dry area where the summer temperature reaches as high as 45°C and precipitation is null.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In present study, K high-e ciency vegetable soybean genotypes exhibit greater Chl a/b ratio but lower total Chl content when suffering low K stress. The higher Chl a/b ratio with enhanced relative content of Chl a in response to low K stress might be an adapted mechanism for K high-e ciency genotypes to maintain photosynthetic capacity, because Chl a is the main pigment in leaves that absorbs light energy, which ensures light absorption as much as possible (Abtahi et al, 2019). Similar results were also revealed in the research of Wang et al (2008).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Root K Uptake Drivers In K High-e Ciency Genotypessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Consistent with photosynthetic parameters, chlorophyll (Chl) content also re ects the photosynthetic activity in leaves (Szafrańska et al, 2017;Choudhury et al, 2019). The effect of photosynthetic photon ux density on the leaf Chl a/b ratio is one of the most characteristic differences between sun and shade leaves (Abtahi et al, 2019). Typically, total Chl content per unit leaf area is lower and the Chl a/b ratio is greater in sun compared to shade soybean leaves (Anderson, 1986;Fritschi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Root K Uptake Drivers In K High-e Ciency Genotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, K high-efficiency vegetable soybean genotypes exhibit lower total Chl content but greater Chl a/b ratio when suffering low K stress. The effect of photosynthetic photon flux density on the leaf Chl a/b ratio is one of the most characteristic differences between sun and shade leaves ( Abtahi et al, 2019 ). Typically, total Chl content per unit leaf area is lower and the Chl a/b ratio is greater in sun compared with shade soybean leaves ( Anderson, 1986 ; Fritschi and Ray, 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, total Chl content per unit leaf area is lower and the Chl a/b ratio is greater in sun compared with shade soybean leaves ( Anderson, 1986 ; Fritschi and Ray, 2007 ). The higher Chl a/b ratio with enhanced relative content of Chl a in response to low K stress might be an adapted mechanism for K high-efficiency genotypes to maintain photosynthetic capacity because Chl a is the main pigment in leaves that absorbs light energy, which ensures light absorption as much as possible ( Abtahi et al, 2019 ). Similar results were also revealed in the research of Wang et al (2008) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%